Crossrail

16.02.18

NIC chair: Government must commit to clear plan for Crossrail 2 and NPR

Progress on Crossrail 2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail has been branded “hugely disappointing”, by the National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) chair, Sir John Armitt.

The NIC’s first Annual Monitoring Report, published today, has raised concerns over the government’s failure to establish a firm timetable or funding plan for the two schemes.

The report also criticises the mobile phone coverage on the country’s railway lines.

Last year, the NIC made several key recommendations, and highlighted areas which required urgent action, including introduction of the hybrid Bill for phase 2a of HS2 and publication of the finalised route for 2b; publication of a single integrated plan for phase one of HS3, now known as Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR); and a published plan for the funding and phased construction of Crossrail 2.

It also recommended a comprehensive plan for the delivery of high quality mobile services alongside main railway lines.

NIC chair, Armitt, said that although progress has been made since these recommendations, there is a “disappointing lack of pace in several areas,” arguing that “much greater urgency” is needed to tackle the poor mobile phone signal coverage on major railway lines.

The report found that progress had been slower regarding the redevelopment of Manchester Piccadilly station, but welcomed the establishment of the Manchester Piccadilly Joint Board to provide advice and implementation of a new scheme for the station.

It calls on the government and other stakeholders to work together to agree a preferred redevelopment option by the end of this year, to avoid delay to any necessary amendments to the HS2 phase 2b Bill.

Criticising the progress made on the two rail schemes, Armitt said: “It is hugely disappointing that nearly two years after the Commission’s reports on Crossrail 2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail, the government still has not firmly committed to a timetable for funding or got a clear plan for delivering either of these nationally significant projects.

“It is vital that decisions on both schemes are made this year and that the government commits to the long-term vision that supports the recommendations we made.”

Top image: Nick Ansell PA Archive

Have you got a story to tell? Would you like to become an RTM columnist? If so, click here.

Comments

Sandy   16/02/2018 at 13:34

Plus ça change, plus le même chose. ♪Why are we waiting... ♪ ?

Peter Jarvis   16/02/2018 at 14:32

If HMG is paralysed with indecision about this Brecsit business, what hope is there of doing anything else at all?

Jimbo   16/02/2018 at 22:20

The problem is that these decisions involve significant amounts of money in this parliament, and until the government understands what the fallout from Brexit will be, they don't want to commit to anything this significant. Before the Brexit vote, someone pointed out that a leave vote would mean governmental paralysis for a number of years, and here we are. Don't expect an decision on these projects any time soon.

Peter   19/02/2018 at 07:59

Agree with you there Jimbo, plus there's the obvious possibility that any senior decision-making civil servant in Whitehall has been seconded (formally or informally) into dealing with Brexit. Pausing investment decisions is the last thing we need now though - anyone with half a brain knows Brexit is going to jolt the economy, ranging somewhere between moderate hit and outright depression. Surely the government should be throwing caution to the wind and ploughing money into infrastructure in the hope that it breeds optimism and cushions at least some of the blow. At the moment we're drifting towards rocks with the engine off - the least the government could do is pull the starter cord.

Lutz   20/02/2018 at 09:22

Someone is panicking that their pet projects are not going to turn out as they had first hoped. They may well be justified. CR2 has running into difficulties with TfL attempting to find a workable solution for early stage funding of more than half the bill in time for the next milestone. Add to this: declining patronage over the last few years on the related national routes now showing up on tube services too, and expectations of problems with high inflation in the coming years. AS it is, the CR2 decision should probably get put back, perhaps into 2020 - after we know the outcome of Brexit.

John Webster   21/02/2018 at 15:00

The NIC have "nailed" the problem here but indecision with some Northern Authorities should have been highlighted as well.

Add your comment

related

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

HS2 Ltd: Five tech firms join Innovation Accelerator initiative

11/09/2020HS2 Ltd: Five tech firms join Innovation Accelerator initiative

HS2 Ltd have announced today (11 Sept) the first five revolutionary tech firms that will join HS2 Ltd’s Innovation Accelerator programme. ... more >
Network Rail publish Decarbonisation Plan

11/09/2020Network Rail publish Decarbonisation Plan

Network Rail have released their interim Traction Decarbonisation Network Strategy, illustrating its preliminary recommendations for decarbonisin... more >
Trains kept moving by AWC despite damaged overhead wires

11/09/2020Trains kept moving by AWC despite damaged overhead wires

Avanti West Coast have taken an unlikely option to allow their timetable to run, without delays, despite damaged overhead wires. The operato... more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the... more > more last word articles >

'the sleepers' daily blog

On the right track, Sulzer is awarded RISAS accreditation for Nottingham Service Centre

29/06/2020On the right track, Sulzer is awarded RISAS accreditation for Nottingham Service Centre

Following an independent audit, Sulzer’s Nottingham Service Centre has been accepted as part of the rail industry supplier approval scheme (RISAS). The accreditation reinforces the high-quality standards that are maintained by Sulzer’s network of independent repair facilities across the UK and further afield in its global network. ... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

The challenge of completing Crossrail

05/07/2019The challenge of completing Crossrail

With a new plan now in place to deliver Crossrail, Hedley Ayres, National Audit Office manager, major projects and programmes, takes a look at ho... more >
Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

04/07/2019Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

The move to decarbonise the rail network involves shifting to cleaner modes of traction by 2050. David Clarke, technical director at the Railway ... more >
Sunshine future beckons for South Wales Railways, says 10:10 Climate Action’s Leo Murray

02/07/2019Sunshine future beckons for South Wales Railways, says 10:10 Climate Action’s Leo Murray

Smart electrification is the way to boost clean energy resources, argues Leo Murray, director at 10:10 Climate Action. Contractors are clear... more >
Ambition doesn’t have to be expensive, says Midland Connect's Maria Machancoses

02/07/2019Ambition doesn’t have to be expensive, says Midland Connect's Maria Machancoses

The TCR Midlands conference is only days away and tickets are going fast for the sector event of the year at the Vox Conference Centre in Birming... more >

rail industry focus

View all News

interviews

Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

24/06/2019Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

Andrew Haines, the Chief Executive of Network Rail, has told the Today programme on Radio 4's BBC’s flagship news programme that he wo... more >