HS2

10.01.17

D-Train project derailed as partners pull out of trial

The future of the D-Train on the Coventry to Nuneaton (NUCKLE) line is in doubt after local partners pulled out of the project.

The three-car Class 230 train, built by Vivarail from upcycled parts of London Underground trains, was originally promised as an innovative solution to pressure on London Midland services on the busy route, which suffers from overcrowding on the one carriage train that calls at the Ricoh Arena, Bedworth and Bermuda Park stations.

However, the D-Train suffered an engine fire during a test run on 30 December, requiring an investigation in partnership with the RAIB.

In response, Coventry City Council, Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership, London Midland, Warwickshire County Council and the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) have jointly announced that they will no longer be able to support the project.

A WMCA spokesperson told RTM that the issue was one of timing.

The fire investigation means that Vivarail will not be able to begin the eight-month trial of the Class 230 in February as planned, the last date possible before a new operator takes over the West Midlands franchise in October.

“There’s no way that they can get the trial up and running by the end of February,” the spokesperson said. “We’ve got no choice but to stop it.” However, they added that WMCA could still be interested in the D-Train “going forward”.

In December, RTM revealed that the Class 230 project was already in doubt, with delays preventing the original plan of beginning a year-long trial in October.

In a statement, the Class 230 partners said: “We have been working with Vivarail on this innovative but technically challenging project to try and find a solution to the UK-wide shortage of diesel trains.

“Our goal throughout has been to provide passengers with an enhanced service on the Coventry to Nuneaton line and this remains the case. That’s why it is so unfortunate that this fire and the subsequent investigation has led to a suspension of the trial that had been due to start in February.

“This delay means there is no longer enough time to run and evaluate a pilot service using these trains before the next local rail franchise starts in October. It is for this reason we have little choice but to reluctantly withdraw from the trial.”

The partners added that they would continue discussions with suppliers of diesel trains, including Vivarail, to try to resolve the impact of the rolling stock shortage on capacity and service operation.

Vivarail told RTM: “We entirely understand the position of our partners in relation to the trial, especially with regard to the franchise timings.  We are very grateful to all the partners for the support they have given, and continue to give, us as a local company.”

The company said it will publish an interim report into the causes of the fire early next week. “It is business as usual at our end and we are confident in the future of the Class 230,” Vivarail concluded.

Have you got a story to tell? Would you like to become an RTM columnist? If so, click here 

Comments

Kev   10/01/2017 at 11:53

a lil short sighted - there will always be teething troubles during heavy type testing - i hope the class 230 is a success, its obviously causing some interest as porterbrook are doing a similar project with a 319 ...

Lee   10/01/2017 at 11:58

I think it's clear there were a lot of risks with this project, and I applaud those behind it for taking it on. I hope this isn't terminal, although sadly I don't see people queuing up to buy these trains. They would be perfect for increasing capacity on marginal routes that can't justify new stock, but is there enough money to be made in those? I suspect most of the D Stock will ultimately go for scrap.

Lutz   10/01/2017 at 13:17

Sun headline: "D-railed D-train D-saster!"

Andrew Gwilt   10/01/2017 at 15:13

The future for the converted Class 230's does look bleak and I still think that most of them could be scrapped whilst some could be saved and used on other lines. They could be used on the local lines in Southwest England and South Wales to replace the Class 143 & Class 144 Pacer trains. But it's sad to see that most of the former LU D78 stocks could be heading for scrap.

Mark   10/01/2017 at 16:34

I am tired of reading about all those wanting these bodyshells & bogies scrapped, the rest of the trains are new. FAR TOO much money is being spent of valuable resources by everyone wanting new. Engines are constantly catching fire including on modern stocks. Find the the problem, sort it, and the nimbys in Coventry back this product. After we should be recycling - including D78's. Best thing to do is to scrap the orders for new foreign built trains, that will solve many issues and reuse these BRITISH built units.

Huguenot   10/01/2017 at 17:16

I tend to agree with Mark. There's nothing to be ashamed of in redeploying trains previously used elsewhere (apart from Pacers, that is) provided that they are properly refurbished and brought up to modern accessibility standards. The Class 319s have been successfully transferred to Northern. Far too many new trains have been bought from abroad when refurbishments would have been cheaper. There can be a future for the Class 442s, Class 365s and all those popular Mk3 coaches from the HSTs. So I wish the D-Train well and hope that it sorts out its problem ASAP.

Stuart   10/01/2017 at 18:26

One setback and they're quitting? That certainly doesn't indicate much conviction to start with. If this program is worthwhile then a few months delay should not be a problem.

Henry Law   10/01/2017 at 19:02

In my view it is a good use of resources to refurbish rather than scrap I had my doubts about this approach from the start. Surely it would have been less risky, and more flexible, to use them to form locomotive powered push-pull sets?

Rail Boy   10/01/2017 at 21:03

About time, ridiculous notion, re-newing dreadful old trains and sending them up north. This should be assigned to the scrap yard along with the laughable freshening up of the Pacer. I am surprised Porterbrook have not come up with an idea of installing wifi on the rocket and bringing that into service stating it has had a modern overhaul.

Jak Jaye   11/01/2017 at 10:10

One more nail in the coffin that is the privatised railway and as for building British we had a proper railway works once it was called York Works untill the short sighted Thatcher closed it along with all the other BR Workshops

David   11/01/2017 at 13:43

Jak, ironically the BREL works survived throughout the Thatcher era, it was privatisation that ended up closing the Holgate Road works. Litchurch Lane survives, however, and it seems to be thriving.

Matthew Read   11/01/2017 at 23:08

I hope the project still goes ahead I hate to see these wonderful trains go for scrap already.

Jerry Alderson   13/01/2017 at 15:22

The problem here is that the trial has been tied to the franchise and that ends soon. The trial could be restarted when the new franchise is running, but the downside is that the new TOC will have committed to certain rolling stock and could not put the D-Train in its bid. My belief is that the Rail Delivery Group should have taken charge of this trial as something that is worthwhile for the rail industry and take it out of the franchise temporarily. Then the trial could re-start as soon as the engine issue is resolved.

Andrew JG.   14/01/2017 at 21:59

Still I would like to see the Vivarail project to continue to convert the former London Underground D78 stocks into brand new British Rail DEMU Class 230 D-Train multiple units that are to replace the Class 142, Class 143 and Class 144 Pacer trains. And to operate on rural routes in parts of Wales, Cornwall, Devon, West Country, Cotswolds, West Midlands and possibly used on rural routes in the East Midlands and local rural lines in East Anglia and possibly in Southern England. Depends where the Class 230's would end up or end up getting scrapped entirely.

Manchester Mike   16/01/2017 at 14:22

DfT can't properly forecast train needs, and the increase in rail ridership shows no signs of abating. So more trains'll be required, and these D-Trains can fill the bill on many lighter lines. Prototypes and trials are meant to suss out problems before full implementation. Plus a third party's engine caught fire, so that fact needs to be better publicized.

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Grayling commits £5m to install digital signalling on TransPennine route

22/09/2017Grayling commits £5m to install digital signalling on TransPennine route

Passengers travelling between Manchester and York could be the first in the north to enjoy an intercity railway that uses digital signalling, Chr... more >
Aslef and GTR once again close to ending DOO dispute

22/09/2017Aslef and GTR once again close to ending DOO dispute

For the third time this year, Aslef and GTR are reportedly close to resolving their dispute on Southern services. According to a statement p... more >
£120m Glasgow Queen Street redevelopment moves into next phase

22/09/2017£120m Glasgow Queen Street redevelopment moves into next phase

The major £120m development of Glasgow Queen Street has this week entered its next phase as work is now underway to prepare redundant build... more >

editor's comment

04/09/2017A series of incredible events

There are a couple of announcements I’d like to make in this editor’s comment, which I believe could be very beneficial to many of our readers.  Firstly, the deadline is fast approaching to enter the UK Rail Industry Awards (UKRIA), which will take place on 22 March 2018 at Battersea Evolution in London.  Now in its fifth year, UKRIA continues to bring together the leaders and decision-makers running the rail ... read more >

last word

How do tram and rail passengers compare?

How do tram and rail passengers compare?

David Sidebottom, director at Transport Focus, analyses the drivers in performance of passenger satisfaction in tram compared to rail. Results published in our recent Tram Passenger Survey (... more > more last word articles >

'the sleepers' daily blog

Investing in rail in the north

22/09/2017Investing in rail in the north

Rob Morris, director of operation at Siemens Rail Automation UK, runs through his organisation’s impressive track record across the north. With the Northern Powerhouse and Transport for the North programmes both firmly established as key drivers for investment and growth across the north of England, much of the region’s rail n... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

Wirral Loop: ‘one industry’ approach to minimise disruption

21/09/2017Wirral Loop: ‘one industry’ approach to minimise disruption

Wayne Menzies, head of rail for Merseytravel and chair of the Liverpool City Region’s Major Events Transport Board, discusses the recently ... more >
Crossrail: track installation complete

21/09/2017Crossrail: track installation complete

Chris Enoch, Crossrail’s railway systems project manager, discusses the complexities in the design and installation of the track system on ... more >
Ballast or slab?

21/09/2017Ballast or slab?

As HS2 moves forward, William Powrie, professor of geotechnical engineering and dean of the Faculty of Engineering and the Environment at the Uni... more >
A network of training excellence

18/09/2017A network of training excellence

Writing on behalf of the Training Alliance, Simon Rennie runs through the early results of a tight-knit collaboration agreement between key rail ... more >

rail industry focus

View all News

interviews

Pushing forward with East West Rail plans

21/09/2017Pushing forward with East West Rail plans

Andy Free, head of engineering assurance at East West Rail (EWR) Alliance, discusses the recent round two public consultation on the plans for th... more >