HS2

08.07.16

Interim report aims to quell public concerns about Crossrail 2

Nearly 21,000 members of the public have raised concerns about Crossrail 2 in a public consultation, published today by Transport for London (TfL) and Network Rail.

TfL and Network Rail said that following the consultation, they are going to make a decision later this year about key issues such as whether to have a station at Tooting Broadway or Balham, and which stations should be served on the New Southgate Branch.

They are also considering a number of changes to the proposals for works at Wimbledon station, including tunnelling the South West Main Line non-stopping services, reconfiguring the existing station layout and considering the use of fewer and narrower platforms, in order to reduce the disruption of works to the town centre.

When respondents said there should be an eastern branch of Crossrail 2, Network Rail and TfL have safeguarded a route from Angel to Hackney Central so that an eastern branch could be added at a later stage should there be a good business case for it.

They said that it will not form part of the first phase under the preferred route, but may be part of future improvements needed in the 2040s.

Michèle Dix, TfL's managing director for Crossrail 2, said: “Crossrail 2 is absolutely vital to meet the increasing demands of the rapidly growing population of London and the south east. It will also help support hundreds of thousands of new homes and jobs across the region.

“We will continue to work in partnership with local communities in the months and years ahead so that we maximise these benefits and preserve and enhance areas along the proposed route.”

The consultation also found a number of more general public concerns, with members of the public questioning whether Crossrail 2 was necessary, worrying about the impact on local residents, businesses and the environment.

In the response, TfL and Network Rail said that Crossrail 2 is necessary to meet the needs of London’s growing population and will support 60,000 jobs during construction and 200,000 jobs when it is built, and that they would address any problems for communities and the environment. It was formally confirmed in the March budget that Crossrail 2 will go ahead.

TfL and Network Rail said they have already addressed a number of concerns raised in the consultation. For example, they have made worksite B at Alexandra Palace smaller to reduce the impact on local green space, rejecting two worksites at Shoreditch Park after concerns were raised about the impact on community facilities, and looking at the feasibility of integrating the station entrance at Dalston into a shopping centre.

Chris Curtis, Network Rail's head of Crossrail 2, said: “The responses to the consultation are helping us develop our proposals further. This work will continue to make sure that the benefits of Crossrail 2 spread right out across London, Surrey, Hertfordshire and beyond.”

TfL and Network Rail are now working with the Department for Transport to develop Crossrail 2 ahead of further public consultation expected to take place this autumn.  Subject to delivering on key recommendations made from the National Infrastructure Commission, a Hybrid Bill could be submitted in 2019 which could enable construction starting in the early 2020s, with the first Crossrail 2 service running in 2033.‎

(Image c. Aubrey Morandarte)

Have you got a story to tell? Would you like to become an RTM columnist? If so, click here.

 

Comments

Andrew Gwilt   08/07/2016 at 15:19

South West Trains could lose some of its inner-suburban routes to Chessington South, Hampton Court, Epsom, Brentford, Twickenham, Richmond, Motspur Park and Shepperton as Crossrail 2 is to take over some of the lines in Southwest London, South London and North Surrey via Wimbledon.

Joel   21/07/2016 at 14:21

The more branches, the more unreliable and irregular the service risks becoming. Outer ends become more vulnerable to disruption (sounds counter-intuitive) while central sections become congested in disruption by lack of sidings and reversers to turn round trains. 'Simpler is safer' (and more reliable), so cut the branches and put the line through Hackney as originally intended, when it was the much-needed Chelsea-Hackney Line, to cut problems on the District and the Central for multiplicity of branches on those two Lines.

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

ECI-2 reveals key areas to embrace change to deliver Digital Railway

21/07/2017ECI-2 reveals key areas to embrace change to deliver Digital Railway

The Digital Railway has taken another step forward this week as bosses responsible for delivering the transformative project have unveiled how th... more >
New bi-mode fleet a requirement for East Midlands as consultation opens

21/07/2017New bi-mode fleet a requirement for East Midlands as consultation opens

The DfT has this week launched its public consultation on the new East Midlands franchise, including specifications for a new bi-mode fleet of in... more >
Grayling throws three major electrification plans out the window 

20/07/2017Grayling throws three major electrification plans out the window 

The government has decided to call off plans to electrify a string of major routes based on the premise that bi-mode trains already provide seaml... more >

editor's comment

03/07/2017Rapid progress needed

As RTM went to press, the National Infrastructure Commission outlined a list of the ‘top 12’ immediate priorities on which ministers must make rapid progress in the next year. Unsurprisingly, major rail schemes, including HS2, Crossrail 2 and HS3, featured highly in the projects that needed speedy development.  Lord Adonis stated that all of these have been agreed in principle, “but require decisive action to get ... read more >

last word

How do tram and rail passengers compare?

How do tram and rail passengers compare?

David Sidebottom, director at Transport Focus, analyses the drivers in performance of passenger satisfaction in tram compared to rail. Results published in our recent Tram Passenger Survey (... more > more last word articles >

'the sleepers' daily blog

Was the HS2 route decision for Sheffield correct?

21/07/2017Was the HS2 route decision for Sheffield correct?

This week has been a busy one for HS2. A number of important announcements were made by Chris Grayling, who will surely be glad to head off on holiday for some rest and relaxation as Parliament heads into its summer recess. Major details of £6.6bn worth of construction contracts were announced, as well as a pair of shortlists for HS... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

How can the new government support rail freight?

20/07/2017How can the new government support rail freight?

Following the recent general election, Maggie Simpson, executive director at the Rail Freight Group, considers what action the government can tak... more >
Building a sustainable future for rail services in Wales

20/07/2017Building a sustainable future for rail services in Wales

Geoff Ogden, interim managing director at Transport for Wales (TfW), talks to RTM about how the organisation is putting sustainable development a... more >
A potential benchmark for engineering quality and architectural design

20/07/2017A potential benchmark for engineering quality and architectural design

Victoria Hills, chief executive officer at the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC), gives RTM an update on the work to create a... more >
Simple changes for energy efficiency

20/07/2017Simple changes for energy efficiency

Michelle Papayannakos, rail sustainability specialist at the RSSB, argues that improving the way energy is managed should be a high priority for ... more >

rail industry focus

View all News

interviews

A game changer for Wales and Borders

17/07/2017A game changer for Wales and Borders

Andy Thomas, managing director for Network Rail’s Wales route, describes how the infrastructure owner will work more collaboratively than e... more >