HS2

27.01.17

ORR warns that ROC risks ‘not yet adequately assessed’ by Network Rail

The chief inspector of railways, Ian Prosser, has told the Transport Select Committee that Network Rail has not yet assessed all of the risks arising from its move to rail operating centres (ROC).

The infrastructure operator is currently transitioning to ROCs as part of its long-term strategy to replace antiquated signal boxes and streamline the signalling workforce.

Prosser told the committee that while a “great deal” of work has been done, there is more to be done, particularly to assuage concerns that the rail network may now have a “single point of failure”.

“While ORR welcomes the substantial measures being planned to introduce redundancy and flexibility into ROC operation, we consider Network Rail has still to demonstrate that it has adequately assessed all of the risks arising from moving to ROCs or has yet given consistent effect to suitable and sufficient controls and mitigations of those risks,” Prosser wrote to the committee as part of its ongoing inquiry on rail safety.

“While the process of moving fully to ROCs will take place over a number of years and the key risks will only be realised gradually over time, we look forward to seeing evidence of their being addressed in 2017.”

Prosser told the committee that the risks of moving to fewer ROCs included a potential impact on signaller workload as a result of having fewer signallers controlling larger areas, particularly during “perturbation”.

He also said that there is the potential for any failure or perturbation to impact “on a greater area than currently”, casting doubt on how train movement will be safely restored, or even a “single point of failure”.

“We are alive to concerns about the potential consequence of a single point of failure,” Prosser said, but assured the committee that there has been “progress” in this area.

Network Rail is looking to alleviate this by putting certain ‘critical national platforms’ like power management and IT in separate ‘data centres’ away from ROCs, providing sufficient connectivity between them to allow one to pick up the other’s workload if a failure occurs.

The infrastructure owners is also considering six ‘workplace recovery sites’ to provide alternative operating locations should a ROC experience significant disruption such as a natural disaster, Prosser said.

The chief inspector of railways warned that the ORR has had to intervene on a few occasions since the migration to ROCs such as when Network Rail made an ‘inadequate’ assessment of the workload impact of migrating to its York ROC in 2014, leaving some maintenance activities to not be carried out.

The regulator has also intervened after trade union safety representatives raised concerns about ergonomic aspects of the ROCs such as noise and lighting levels, although Prosser said that there are now more consistent arrangements across the network.

Network Rail began carrying out a full review of what requirements ROCs would need in 2016, including risk assessments, although the ORR has not yet seen the final outcome of these. The ORR expects to see Network Rail’s revised standard early this year.

Have you got a story to tell? Would you like to become an RTM columnist? If so, click here.

Comments

John Grant   27/01/2017 at 17:51

Pity privatisation happened before the transition to IECCs was complete. The ones that were going to be running the WCML (before the project was killed by privatisation) would have been linked together so that the whole line could be run from any one of them. Unions raising "safety" issues again: when there was a signallers' strike in (I think) the early 90s the only parts of the network that were running were the ones with IECCs, so you can see the unions would be against them.

GW   27/01/2017 at 21:05

On those that already exist there have been times when large sections of the control area have ground to a halt due to fire alarms sounding and the ROC being evacuated.

John Grant   27/01/2017 at 22:37

@GW: true, there was one at King's Cross last year. I don't remember it happening with the IECCs, but on the other hand as I remember them the signallers all sat in a single room (though maybe with a less trigger-happy fire alarm?). The various subsytems were connected by a network that would go several hundred metres, so they could have had two control rooms. There were two networks and most of the equipment was duplicated (and connected to both networks) so they'd certainly thought about avoiding single points of failure.

G   28/01/2017 at 20:18

Network started a review into requirements in2016 at least a year after the first ROCs opened or were meant to be open. I think that sums the whole project up.

John Grant   30/01/2017 at 13:52

Oh great! Ready, aim, fire but not in that order.

Jerry Alderson   31/01/2017 at 19:51

The "single point of failure" issue is a bit of a red herring. With 800 small signal boxes there are 800 single points of failure that impact local areas initially but the failure spreads out as it impacts on every route thereafter. With 12 (11?) ROCs then the potential is for a major failure affecting a wide area at the same time. The impact is down to how you manage failure. There is no failover possible with the small local signal boxes but a ROC should be able to failover to a neighbouring ROC. There were going to be 14 ROCs. It was reduced ot 12. I've heard that the plan is to have only one rather than two in Scotland (Edinburgh and Glasgow). If this is the case then I think this is wrong as you cannot have (politically) a Scottish ROC failing over to an English one, especially if BR is broken up and even more so if Scotland becomes independent.

Richard Ash   05/02/2017 at 17:00

With old-fashioned signal boxes, there was a well-used protocol for "switching out" a box so that trains could run through without the signal box, or it's signals, being operational. You lost line capacity (because two blocks merged) but trains kept running. Now it seems that any level of signalling fault results in a complete stoppage because the processes for managing with degraded facilities have been allowed to be lost (as per the signalling power failure at York which stopped all trains for half a day).

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Battered stretch of West Coast main line gets £4m repairs after landslide

23/11/2017Battered stretch of West Coast main line gets £4m repairs after landslide

Network Rail have completed £4m worth of work to stabilise embankments after a stretch of line between Watford and King’s Langley suf... more >
Hammond pledges £250m to West Midlands transport in second devo deal

23/11/2017Hammond pledges £250m to West Midlands transport in second devo deal

A new devolution deal has secured £250m of funding for the West Midlands transport infrastructure. The deal between the government and the... more >
NAO: Rail network ‘cannot reliably support’ new Thameslink services

23/11/2017NAO: Rail network ‘cannot reliably support’ new Thameslink services

The current state of the rail network is not fit to support the new Thameslink Programme and will cause future delays and problems. It has b... more >

editor's comment

21/11/2017Keep up, we’re moving on

There has never been a more exciting time to write about rail: technology is improving, ways of working are changing and pan-industry collaboration is at its peak, all in an effort to keep up with unprecedented levels of demand. I am therefore thrilled to present you my first-ever edition as editor of RTM, which I am confident is bursting at the seams with excellent contributions from leaders across the board. One of the special feature... read more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the... more > more last word articles >

'the sleepers' daily blog

Eurotunnel rebrand: a more ‘Anglo-Saxon’ name?

21/11/2017Eurotunnel rebrand: a more ‘Anglo-Saxon’ name?

The owners of Eurotunnel have decided to change its name to Getlink, a move which the company described as “very Anglo-Saxon.” Despite the company operating across both England and France it has decided to change its name as it looks to “take on the challenges of new forms of mobility.” Previously called Group... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

Boosting workforce safety through design automation

17/11/2017Boosting workforce safety through design automation

David Shipman, innovations engineering manager in IP Signalling at Network Rail, makes the case for safeguarding the industry’s workforce t... more >
Rail risk: reality and perception

17/11/2017Rail risk: reality and perception

George Bearfield, director of system safety and health at the RSSB, looks at risk – reality and perception – and how the industry nee... more >
The new era of station retail

17/11/2017The new era of station retail

Hamish Kiernan, commercial director of retail at Network Rail Property, explains how investment in better retail outlets is transforming the cust... more >
Digital connectivity fit for the 2020s

17/11/2017Digital connectivity fit for the 2020s

Raj Sivalingam, executive director for telecommunications and spectrum at techUK, makes the case for pan-industry collaboration in order to deplo... more >

rail industry focus

View all News

interviews

Modernising journeys in north east England

09/11/2017Modernising journeys in north east England

First Hull Trains is about to embark on the biggest fleet overhaul it has delivered since being set up in 2000. Managing director Will Dunnett te... more >