Rail freight

30.06.15

Council refused permission to appeal Radlett freight decision

The Court of Appeal has refused to give St Albans City & District Council permission to appeal the dismissal of its recent court challenge against the proposal for a strategic rail freight interchange (SRFI) at Radlett.                   

Last year, the council challenged the communities secretary’s decision to grant planning permission for the SRFI at Park Street near St Albans. However, the High Court dismissed the council’s challenge on 13 March. 

RTM reported back in April that the council confirmed it would seek permission to appeal the dismissal, but yesterday it received notice that the permission had been refused. 

In his decision Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Sullivan says that he considers the grounds of appeal put forward by the council do not have a real prospect of success. The council now has seven days to decide whether to request that Lord Justice Sullivan’s decision is reconsidered at an oral hearing before the Court of Appeal.  

A council spokeswoman said: “We will take advice from our legal advisors before making this decision.” 

Philippa Edmunds, Freight on Rail manager, told RTM: “This decision is most welcome. Without terminals, which are the freight equivalent of stations for passengers, more freight cannot be transferred to the railways. 

“Road/rail transfer stations such as Radlett are urgently needed at key strategic locations on our major networks to get long distance consumer freight onto the railways, the low carbon energy efficient safer alternative to HGVs which reduces road congestion.

“Radlett has become a test case because of its location in the south east where there is a lack of alternative sites with good road and rail connections.” 

(Image: c. mwmbwls)

Tell us what you think – have your say below or email opinion@railtechnologymagazine.com

Comments

Steve Bowes-Phipps   30/06/2015 at 12:01

Ms Edmunds comment on railfreight terminals is great if such a terminal were to be used for rail freight and not just road freight. However, this site is so unsuitable that it will require major tunnel and bridge work between St Albans and London (which in itself is very Carbon-intensive), plus there will be significant disruption to Thameslink commuters that may force many of them onto the roads for years to come. Not to mention the destruction of the largest piece of green belt left between St Albans and London, that will destroy the surrounding villages with light and noise pollution, and with raised traffic levels from the freight lorries (300/day) on to what is already one of the most congested trunk routes in the UK. Add to this the 3000-odd staff needed to operate it in an area of historically low employment and high skill levels, which means that they will need to drive in in their own cars from places such as Luton and North London. How can anyone sell this as 'low carbon'? The sensitive (and greener) solution would have been to site it at Upper Sundon where trunk road links have already been (or are currently being) built, and there is a willing low-skilled workforce available to staff it AND the local council has actively sought it.

Neil Palmer   01/07/2015 at 02:03

Steve, Please explain how a site bordered on the west & east by the St Albans Abbey branch & Midland Main lines, and on the north & south by the A414 & M25, is an unsuitable location for a freight terminal. Also why would it require major tunnel & bridge work between St Albans & London?

Nick K   03/07/2015 at 08:46

The arguments being presented by St Albans Council (railway paths, congestion etc.) are obviously being totally ignored. Maybe they should take a different tack, of being allowed to heavily fine the operators for every lorry load NOT handled via a train. But this would NEVER be permitted - Helioslough might even abandon the project...

Steve Bowes-Phipps   22/09/2016 at 11:52

@Neil Sorry for my late reply, I didn't realise you'd posed a question to me. The answer is simple - the nearest track (Midland Main Line) has the wrong gauge and the tunnels are the wrong height for the freight cars that need to go through them. Also, the positioning of the site means that trains will have to slow considerably and pass over the other track, causing huge delays to the timetable to accommodate. There are much better places to put this freight depot, which is a good idea in principle, but St Albans is not it.

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Rail Minister sees new deep cleaning equipment and thanks volunteers

22/09/2020Rail Minister sees new deep cleaning equipment and thanks volunteers

Rail Minister Chris Heaton-Harris has today (22nd Sept) thanked ‘Journey Makers’ volunteers whilst visiting Norwich Rail Station and ... more >
Ep.17 Becoming a data-driven railway, Kelley Quirk and Martin Mason

21/09/2020Ep.17 Becoming a data-driven railway, Kelley Quirk and Martin Mason

This week host Ailsa Cowen is joined by two guests from Network Rail. Martin Mason, Programme Manager, at Network Rail’s Digital Railway an... more >
Ely rail capacity upgrade open for public consultation

21/09/2020Ely rail capacity upgrade open for public consultation

Network Rail have today opened their first round of public consultation for proposals to upgrade the railway in and around Ely and will run for s... more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the... more > more last word articles >

'the sleepers' daily blog

On the right track, Sulzer is awarded RISAS accreditation for Nottingham Service Centre

29/06/2020On the right track, Sulzer is awarded RISAS accreditation for Nottingham Service Centre

Following an independent audit, Sulzer’s Nottingham Service Centre has been accepted as part of the rail industry supplier approval scheme (RISAS). The accreditation reinforces the high-quality standards that are maintained by Sulzer’s network of independent repair facilities across the UK and further afield in its global network. ... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

The challenge of completing Crossrail

05/07/2019The challenge of completing Crossrail

With a new plan now in place to deliver Crossrail, Hedley Ayres, National Audit Office manager, major projects and programmes, takes a look at ho... more >
Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

04/07/2019Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

The move to decarbonise the rail network involves shifting to cleaner modes of traction by 2050. David Clarke, technical director at the Railway ... more >
Sunshine future beckons for South Wales Railways, says 10:10 Climate Action’s Leo Murray

02/07/2019Sunshine future beckons for South Wales Railways, says 10:10 Climate Action’s Leo Murray

Smart electrification is the way to boost clean energy resources, argues Leo Murray, director at 10:10 Climate Action. Contractors are clear... more >
Ambition doesn’t have to be expensive, says Midland Connect's Maria Machancoses

02/07/2019Ambition doesn’t have to be expensive, says Midland Connect's Maria Machancoses

The TCR Midlands conference is only days away and tickets are going fast for the sector event of the year at the Vox Conference Centre in Birming... more >

rail industry focus

View all News

interviews

Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

24/06/2019Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

Andrew Haines, the Chief Executive of Network Rail, has told the Today programme on Radio 4's BBC’s flagship news programme that he wo... more >