The Sleeper's Blog

22.01.19

Trashing the 'ticket' train of thought

Source: RTM Dec/Jan 19

techUK recently published its Future Mobility Services report in which it presented its vision of a multimodal, digitally-enabled, and customer-focused transport ecosystem – with the rail sector forming a major part of this. Jessica Russell, techUK’s programme manager for the Transport and Smart Cities groups under SmarterUK, reports.

Digital technologies are transforming almost every industry, from retail to health to transport. Alongside (and enabled by) the integration of digital technologies, we are seeing a shift towards the provision of mobility rather than transport services. This recognises that we need to deliver dynamic, end-to-end, multimodal journeys and, most importantly, ones that are designed for the traveller.

The transport sector is on the precipice of significant change. The president of General Motors, Dan Ammann, expects that both business and “personal mobility will change more in the next five years than the last 50.”

Although we are indeed seeing innovative ideas and services transform the sector, innovation is not just about designing or integrating new technology. If it is, the mobility services sector may suffer from institutional inertia due to the legacy of traditional and inflexible regulation, legislation, and commercial structures, including franchising, procurement and, of course, ticketing.

Nick Chrissos, director of innovation at Cisco, said: “Innovation has to be about more than just technology… it’s also about thinking and doing things differently.”

To unlock the benefits and realise a vision for the future of mobility services, we need more regulatory flexibility to be able to change how we think about, as well as do, mobility services.

Will sticking to the ticket stop us in our tracks?

Take someone who commutes from a south-east town to London and forgets their season ticket – their bright yellow and orange piece of paper that is still required to prove they have paid for the journey they do daily.

To get to work on that day, they need to purchase a single day ticket and later apply for a refund, the process for which includes: going to the ticket office, filling out a paper form, and waiting up to 28 days for the money to be refunded.

It’s fair to say that this is a far-from-smart process. It reflects an entire industry forced to operate under the influence of institutional inertia and legacy legislation that stifles innovation and the ability to integrate technological solutions.

Ticketing is a particularly painful point for many in the mobility services sector. Inflexible regulation has meant that innovation in ticketing across almost all modes has been, at best, a frustrating, drawn-out exercise; or, at worst, pushed aside into the ‘too hard basket’ in lieu of other opportunities.

But perhaps the question we should be asking is not “how can I make my tickets digital?” but “is ‘the ticket’ the best approach to managing the customer’s permit to ride?”

Let us look at the evolution of tickets in London. The Underground Ticketing System (UTS) was introduced in the 1980s, partly as an effort to improve sophistication and efficiency around selling tickets, and partly to combat “large internal losses due to either fraud or outright theft,” not because it was the most customer-centric way to permit a person to use transport services.

In the early 2000s, we saw convenience feature in the logic of ticketing. London began replacing the UTS with a new fare structure and the iconic blue Oyster card which, while revolutionary, still required travellers to obtain, top up, remember to pack, and use a specific card.

It is also interesting to note that this is not a ʻone-transformation-fits-all-citiesʼ option either, because while London has now started to move onto the use of contactless cards, a lot of the UK is still rolling out schemes reflective of the Oyster with mixed degrees of success.

Further to this, PwC’s annual ‘Smarter travel: the future of ticketing’ survey has tracked a dramatic decline in the use of ordinary paper tickets from 2012 to today, where we are seeing “a much greater selection of ticket options being purchased.” This behavioural change indicates that customers not only expect better services, but are willing and able to adopt them as they are introduced.

Certainly, all of this is not to say that ticket service providers have done or are doing wrong. They have operated within specific regulatory and legislative constraints, and it is the operating environment that has shaped the speed and trajectory of innovation. But, as we are starting to see increasing diversity in mobility services providers, and as we move ahead with the government’s ‘Future of Mobility Grand Challenge,’ we risk holding ourselves back with legacy mindsets that no longer reflect the industry or the customer.

Is the ‘ticket’ really going to support the facilitation of an integrated, citizen-centric, multimodal mobility service that we can imagine? Or do we need more innovation coming from regulatory leeway rather than loopholes?

The transport industry needs a regulatory overhaul if we are going to at least allow or, at best, encourage innovative solutions to support the transformation into mobility services.

There has been much to applaud in terms of the government’s efforts to date, including:

  • Allocating the ‘Future of Mobility’ as one of the Industrial Strategy’s ‘Grand Challenges’;
  • Conducting significant reviews and consultations such as the Future of Urban Mobility Strategy and the Williams Rail Review;
  • Launching the Rail Sector Deal;
  • Law Commission’s automated vehicles consultation.

These strategies, reviews and consultations are important steps towards developing a stronger understating of each mode’s challenges, barriers and opportunities for improvement. However, the scope of the individual reviews means the sector will continue to be siloed in its regulatory and legislative environment – a legacy that could continue to hinder a truly interoperable and multimodal service with payment structures and permits-to-ride that underpin it.

We have indeed already seen success stories where changes to regulation and legislation have enabled progress in facilitating the transformation of transport sectors. In Finland, the home of Mobility-as-a-Service, the Ministry of Transport and Communications adopted the “groundbreaking” Act on Transport Services to “bring together transport market legislation and create the preconditions for digitalisation of transport and new business models,” stating that “its key aim is provision of customer-oriented transport services.”

The UK is certainly capable of making similar strides as Finland, but the government will need to take decisive action and work closely with the wider mobility services industry.

It is fair to say the current challenge is not technical. It is that meaningful innovation is stifled by a regulatory environment that is still shaped by traditions and legacies that are decreasingly reflective of today’s customers’ needs and expectations for mobility services.

Ticketing is just one area that is ripe for innovation and improvement, and there may come a time when we need to trash the ticket as the only or best way of managing permits to use mobility services.

The sector needs to see more holistic reviews and reforms that look not just at individual modes, but at how they can be integrated to provide more interoperable, digitally-enabled and customer-centric mobility services.

 

Enjoying RTM? Subscribe here to receive our weekly news updates or click here to receive a copy of the magazine!

Comments

There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment

 

related

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Scrap HS2 and use its £56bn budget to fund 28 alternative projects, urges TPA

14/05/2019Scrap HS2 and use its £56bn budget to fund 28 alternative projects, urges TPA

Scrapping the £56bn HS2 project could pave the way for 28 separate local infrastructure schemes to be funded instead with the case “g... more >
DfT calls for new technology to transform transport accessibility, but union warns against ‘faceless’ railway

14/05/2019DfT calls for new technology to transform transport accessibility, but union warns against ‘faceless’ railway

The DfT has called for new technologies to revolutionise travel for older people and those with disabilities, but the RMT has “reacted with... more >
First leg of HS2 ‘passing the point of no return’ due to amount of money already invested, says NAO head

13/05/2019First leg of HS2 ‘passing the point of no return’ due to amount of money already invested, says NAO head

HS2 is on the “verge of passing the point of no return” and the amount of money spent would make scrapping the flagship project &ldqu... more >

editor's comment

23/01/2018Out with the old...

Despite a few disappointing policy announcements, especially for the electrification aficionados amongst us, 2017 was, like Darren Caplan writes on page 20, a year generally marked by positive news for the rail industry. We polished off the iconic Ordsall Chord (p32), hit some solid milestones on Thameslink (p40), progressed on ambitious rolling stock orders (p16), and finally started moving forward on HS2 (p14) ‒ paving the way for a New Ye... read more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the TOC, gives RTM an update on the innovative scheme. Recognising that young people are more likely to take a risk trespassing on railway tracks, CrossCountry and the Scouts have come together to encourage Britain’s younger generations to be... more > more last word articles >
board2

'the sleepers' daily blog

Making the railways safer and more reliable with Ze-Power

13/05/2019Making the railways safer and more reliable with Ze-Power

Professor Meiling Zhu, chair of mechanical engineering and head of the Energy Harvesting Research Group (EHRG) at the University of Exeter, introduces us to Ze-Power (Zero Power, Large Area Rail Track Monitoring): an innovative Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) funded project aiming to make the railway tracks safer and... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

The railway franchising model is broken, and passengers are paying the price

13/05/2019The railway franchising model is broken, and passengers are paying the price

Meg Hillier, MP for Hackney South and Shoreditch and chair of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), gives her view on the state of the UK’s ... more >
NSAR: Tackling the digital skills shortage

13/05/2019NSAR: Tackling the digital skills shortage

The National Skills Academy for Rail (NSAR) chief executive Neil Robertson returns to write for RTM, this time, to assess the digital skills shor... more >
Delivering cost-effective electrification

13/05/2019Delivering cost-effective electrification

David Clarke, technical director of the Railway Industry Association (RIA), sets out the findings of a new report on how rail electrification can... more >
5G: An opportunity to revolutionise on-train connectivity

13/05/20195G: An opportunity to revolutionise on-train connectivity

Simon Holmes, group head of digital (engineering) at FirstGroup, introduces us to the 5G solution being delivered for the rail sector.  ... more >

rail industry focus

View all News

interviews

Advancing the rail industry with management degree apprenticeships

08/05/2019Advancing the rail industry with management degree apprenticeships

In answering the pressing questions of how current and future generations of managers can provide solutions to high-profile infrastructure projec... more >
Women in rail - is the industry on the right track?

12/03/2019Women in rail - is the industry on the right track?

RTM sits down with Samantha Smith, sole female member of the TransPennine Route Upgrade Alliance Leadership Team, to find out more about encourag... more >
TfN Strategic Transport Plan: not just for transport's sake

22/01/2019TfN Strategic Transport Plan: not just for transport's sake

Peter Molyneux, Transport for the North’s (TfN’s) strategic roads director, has been leading on the development of the seven economic... more >