Track and signalling

20.09.16

Network Rail abandons plans to privatise telecoms network

Network Rail’s telecoms network has been excluded from its planned sale of assets, the infrastructure owner has confirmed.

Network Rail announced in March that it is considering selling off a wide range of assets, including its fibre optic and telecoms network, which delivers voice, data, video and broadband services to enable communication between trains and maintenance teams.

It is also considering finding a buyer for its electrical and land assets.

A Network Rail spokesperson said: “We started to look at options to divest of spare capacity in the telecoms network. There are now no immediate plans to progress this as we focus on other assets under consideration.”

They added that the sales were not part of plans to generate £1.8bn to fund the Rail Upgrade Plan, an ambitious programme of improvements currently being promoted in the ‘Britain Runs on Rail’ campaign.

Network Rail is facing significant funding shortfalls, with its debt due to reach £50bn by the end of the decade.

In August, Network Rail announced that it had appointed Neil Sachdev and Steve Smith as non-executive directors with responsibility for selling non-core assets through the recently-created Property board.

It has also appointed Citigroup to assess options regarding the sale of 18 major stations, including London Waterloo, Manchester Piccadilly and Birmingham New Street, with a report expected back by the end of the year. The proposals are opposed by anti-privatisation group We Own It.

Have you got a story to tell? Would you like to become an RTM columnist? If so, click here.

Comments

Ian Dinmore   20/09/2016 at 12:29

It's good news that NR will not now sell of their telecom assets, as the spare capacity has the potential to bring in an annual lease revenue from the 3rd party telecom operators and cable TV companies who are clamouring for additional capacity - that could be a very handy little annual fill-up for NR's hard budget management?

John Anderson   20/09/2016 at 15:58

Fortunately, someone with a functioning brain and an understanding that flogging vital assets isn't the brilliant idea that the Tory idiots would have us believe, must have remembered the utter farce which resulted from the last sell off of the Telecoms assets (the organisation is still in the recovery process from that mess).

Tothehills   21/09/2016 at 09:44

Given the move to ETCS, where telecoms is an integral part, this is definitely the right decision. My concern is that signalling systems structures are going to change very dramatically and NR's Fault finding measures are not up to it. As for John Anderson comment - I can remember when BT was state owned and state the customer service of the PO was awful. my parents had to wait 6 years for a phone line to be installed in the 70's. While BT customer services are not the best, they are still a billion times better than the abysmal self-serving quality of the 60's and 70's.

John Anderson   21/09/2016 at 11:04

FYI Tothehills, I wasn't referring to BT, I was referring to the BRT / Racal Telecom / Thales / Global Crossing / Level 3 farce after rail privatisation, which is still having a negative impact on the railway. However, I wouldn't say that BT is anything to boast about in terms of private sector 'success', still having a monopoly of physical service provision via Openreach for those of us located anywhere other than city centres. The 70s is really not a valid comparison now given advances in technology. I would suggest over 4 months to fix a simple copper cable fault just last year, with BT Retail and BT Openreach continually passing the buck between each other, and total indifference from the higher echelons when contacted, is a better indicator of the 'benefits' of the private sector.

Tothe Hills   22/09/2016 at 09:49

To JA, now I am with you. Agree with you that BT are nowhere near perfect, I have been advised to not go with them by one of their employees! Bizarrely though, they own Plusnet which has the best rating in the industry (though I think they are about to test my patience).

Lutz   27/09/2016 at 22:44

So if there is marketable spare capacity on the system, why has there been no significant take-up of that capacity by data carriers? Perhaps because the system is of no value to modern carrier operations?

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Grayling commits £5m to install digital signalling on TransPennine route

22/09/2017Grayling commits £5m to install digital signalling on TransPennine route

Passengers travelling between Manchester and York could be the first in the north to enjoy an intercity railway that uses digital signalling, Chr... more >
Aslef and GTR once again close to ending DOO dispute

22/09/2017Aslef and GTR once again close to ending DOO dispute

For the third time this year, Aslef and GTR are reportedly close to resolving their dispute on Southern services. According to a statement p... more >
£120m Glasgow Queen Street redevelopment moves into next phase

22/09/2017£120m Glasgow Queen Street redevelopment moves into next phase

The major £120m development of Glasgow Queen Street has this week entered its next phase as work is now underway to prepare redundant build... more >

editor's comment

04/09/2017A series of incredible events

There are a couple of announcements I’d like to make in this editor’s comment, which I believe could be very beneficial to many of our readers.  Firstly, the deadline is fast approaching to enter the UK Rail Industry Awards (UKRIA), which will take place on 22 March 2018 at Battersea Evolution in London.  Now in its fifth year, UKRIA continues to bring together the leaders and decision-makers running the rail ... read more >

last word

How do tram and rail passengers compare?

How do tram and rail passengers compare?

David Sidebottom, director at Transport Focus, analyses the drivers in performance of passenger satisfaction in tram compared to rail. Results published in our recent Tram Passenger Survey (... more > more last word articles >

'the sleepers' daily blog

Investing in rail in the north

22/09/2017Investing in rail in the north

Rob Morris, director of operation at Siemens Rail Automation UK, runs through his organisation’s impressive track record across the north. With the Northern Powerhouse and Transport for the North programmes both firmly established as key drivers for investment and growth across the north of England, much of the region’s rail n... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

Wirral Loop: ‘one industry’ approach to minimise disruption

21/09/2017Wirral Loop: ‘one industry’ approach to minimise disruption

Wayne Menzies, head of rail for Merseytravel and chair of the Liverpool City Region’s Major Events Transport Board, discusses the recently ... more >
Crossrail: track installation complete

21/09/2017Crossrail: track installation complete

Chris Enoch, Crossrail’s railway systems project manager, discusses the complexities in the design and installation of the track system on ... more >
Ballast or slab?

21/09/2017Ballast or slab?

As HS2 moves forward, William Powrie, professor of geotechnical engineering and dean of the Faculty of Engineering and the Environment at the Uni... more >
A network of training excellence

18/09/2017A network of training excellence

Writing on behalf of the Training Alliance, Simon Rennie runs through the early results of a tight-knit collaboration agreement between key rail ... more >

rail industry focus

View all News

interviews

Pushing forward with East West Rail plans

21/09/2017Pushing forward with East West Rail plans

Andy Free, head of engineering assurance at East West Rail (EWR) Alliance, discusses the recent round two public consultation on the plans for th... more >