Track and signalling

24.01.18

Network Rail disputes UTG ‘fairer’ rail access cost claim

Network Rail officials have written to the Office of Road and Rail (ORR) to dispute claims from the Urban Transport Group (UTG) about rail access costs.

The UTG had initially claimed that future changes to costs imposed on regional rail services could have a negative impact on the operators “least able to bear it.”

In response, Network Rail says the new approach to charges is actually a “significant improvement” to the current system.

The centre of the dispute is the issue of whether regional services should be classed as “marginal users” of the rail network, a point which was raised by the UTG as a reason why these organisations should have less costs levied against them.

However, Network Rail says this is not the case and that it is not reasonable to describe regional services this way or to imply that they should only be responsible for the “wear and tear” costs of track.

In the letter, Peter Swattridge, head of regulatory economics at Network Rail and writing on behalf the organisation’s CEO Mark Carne, said: “At present, neither Network Rail nor any other industry body allocate the fixed costs of the GB rail network to all train services on a consistent basis (i.e. franchised passenger, freight and open access services).

“This means that it is not clear which train services are responsible for our fixed costs being incurred. It is, therefore, currently not possible to make meaningful like-for-like comparisons between different types of service.”

Swattridge also said that his organisation would be happy to discuss issues involved in the letter in more detail.

In addition to the dispute over regional services, the letter also deals with two issues from the UTG’s document which the infrastructure manager claims are factually incorrect.

In particular, this refers to the assertion that the damage caused by freight trains to infrastructure is largely ignored. Network Rail said that this was not the case because freight companies are subject to the Variable Usage Charges which reflects the type of cargo being hauled.

The UTG also made the claim that allotting service costs to regional operators in this way could lead to gains for long-distance services, potentially meaning money could be diverted away from rail services and investment.

Swattridge wrote: “We do not agree with this statement. To the extent that cost allocations are reflected in operators’ fixed charges, the franchising process aims to hold operators harmless to methodological changes in charges.

“Therefore, any changes in the level of operators’ fixed charges from the introduction of our new methodology would be passed back to funders, under the terms of operators’ franchise agreements, and be available for reinvestment in the rail industry.”

The decision to allocate more of the network’s overall costs to regional rail services has come following a series of industry consultations by ORR and Network Rail.

Network Rail’s recent consultation on fixed cost allocation could see Northern Rail’s fixed costs increase by 50%, whilst Merseyrail, which the Urban Transport Group says is “largely self-contained” could see its allocation increase by 66%.

Virgin West Coast and Virgin East Coast would both see their allocations reduce by 58%.

Have you got a story to tell? Would you like to become an RTM columnist? If so, click here.

Comments

Huguenot   24/01/2018 at 17:34

The old BR concept of Prime User seemed to work well.

Lutz   24/01/2018 at 19:15

Given the lack of capacity on various routes it seems reasonable to start allotting costs on a more even basis and let the market price-out under-valued services.

Frankh   25/01/2018 at 11:51

"let the market price-out under-valued services." And the franchisee is then in default of the contract because they can't run services as agreed. Then what?

Add your comment

 

related

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

ORR report: ‘No one took charge’ in May timetable chaos, ‘everyone made mistakes’

20/09/2018ORR report: ‘No one took charge’ in May timetable chaos, ‘everyone made mistakes’

A scathing report into the May timetable chaos has blasted transport secretary Chris Grayling, Network Rail, and the DfT’s handling of the ... more >
Government rejects claims of transport spending ‘regional imbalance’

20/09/2018Government rejects claims of transport spending ‘regional imbalance’

The Transport Committee has urged the DfT to “be more specific about the economic rebalancing effects it intends to achieve&rdquo... more >
DfT quietly pulls the plug on CrossCountry franchise competition

20/09/2018DfT quietly pulls the plug on CrossCountry franchise competition

The government has decided to pull the plug on the CrossCountry franchise competition as a result of its rail review announcement today. Bec... more >

editor's comment

23/01/2018Out with the old...

Despite a few disappointing policy announcements, especially for the electrification aficionados amongst us, 2017 was, like Darren Caplan writes on page 20, a year generally marked by positive news for the rail industry. We polished off the iconic Ordsall Chord (p32), hit some solid milestones on Thameslink (p40), progressed on ambitious rolling stock orders (p16), and finally started moving forward on HS2 (p14) ‒ paving the way for a New Ye... read more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the... more > more last word articles >

'the sleepers' daily blog

The East Coast franchise report tells us what we already knew: it was a bid set up to fail

18/09/2018The East Coast franchise report tells us what we already knew: it was a bid set up to fail

RTM's Jack Donnelly assesses what the Transport Committee's latest report on the VTEC franchise means for the industry as a whole “Even now, there is no concrete plan, nor timescales, for the interim operator of this franchise. From our inquiry, we cannot be sure, and cannot reassure passengers or public, that the arrangements ... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

Northern Powerhouse Rail: The need for change

18/09/2018Northern Powerhouse Rail: The need for change

Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR) will be transformational for the north – it will change the way people live, work, and play. It will rebalan... more >
Innovation through people and technology

18/09/2018Innovation through people and technology

Ian Prosser, HM chief inspector of railways and director of railway safety at the ORR, picks out the key industry challenges to focus on based on... more >
Why we all must mind the gap

18/09/2018Why we all must mind the gap

Clair Mowbray, chief executive of the National College for High Speed Rail (NCHSR), explains how we can all ensure the UK’s next generation... more >
3D printing: from virtual to real

11/09/20183D printing: from virtual to real

Like so many other technological advancements, 3D printing has moved from being the stuff of science fiction, through niche industrial applicatio... more >

rail industry focus

View all News

interviews

Going global: an interview with Network Rail’s Leevan Finney

29/08/2018Going global: an interview with Network Rail’s Leevan Finney

RTM’s Jack Donnelly sat down with one of the leading minds behind Network Rail’s most advanced and innovative rail maintenance techno... more >