HS2

18.12.17

MPs condemn £75m Sheffield tram-train pilot as a ‘how not to’ seminar

The pilot scheme to introduce a tram-train system between Sheffield and Rotherham has been like a  ‘how not to’ seminar for future projects, the Public Accounts Committee has claimed in a scathing new report.

Costs on the project rose from an estimated £15m up to £75m because of DfT failures to properly challenge Network Rail’s plans both at the outset and throughout the project.

Neither organisation had properly quantified the benefits from the project, meaning decisions were made without knowing if it would provide taxpayers with value for money.

The works are running two-and-a-half years behind schedule and MPs now said that, despite Network Rail revising its plans, the committee is still concerned that the projected benefits will not be achieved.

PAC chair, Meg Hillier, argued the project had not only promised great benefits for passengers but had been put forward as a potential model for similar future schemes in Manchester, Cardiff and Glasgow.

“Instead the reality is another rail project with all the makings of a 'how not to' seminar for senior civil servants,” she commented.

The plans had been trialling new technology in the UK, but both Network Rail and the DfT failed to properly consider the “high-level of uncertainty” which would be involved with the scheme.

“There have been long delays, and it is still not clear how, or even if, the experience of running this pilot will reduce the costs and improve delivery of any future tram-train schemes,” Hillier continued.

“Not for the first time, we heard evidence intended to reassure parliament and the public that lessons learned on this project will ensure the failings identified will not arise again.”

She went on to call on the government to back up the committee’s findings with a “meaningful review” of the way it manages such projects, which would take a transparent look at the costs and results of the project.

The committee also compared Network Rail’s failings on this project to the similar issues which occurred across the GWR modernisation programme.

The first tram-train services started on the line in September, with the National Audit Office revealing earlier in the year that funding had risen as high as five times what was initially forecast.

In RTM’s Aug/Sept 17 edition, Andrew Braddock, chairman of the Light Rail Transit Association (LRTA), analysed the issues which have affected the scheme since its beginning nearly three years ago.

Have you got a story to tell? Would you like to become an RTM columnist? If so, click here.

Comments

Andrew Gwilt   19/12/2017 at 10:43

When will these Class 399 Tram-train vehicles be operating to/from Rotherham once the electrification is completed.

ICN   19/12/2017 at 12:40

Andrew, the issues are more complicated than just the provision of electrification, hence the need for a pilot scheme.

Ben   19/12/2017 at 12:45

Andrew, in your haste to post your comment you forgot the question mark. Are you making a statement or asking a question? Maybe you meant 'when will these class 399 train-train vehicles be operating?' as they obviously won't be operating before the electrification is completed. That part of your sentence is superfluous at best, much like most of your posts.

Sonning Cutting   19/12/2017 at 16:52

No mention of any discussions with the Germans who were pioneers in tram/trains. Am sure they could have pointed out a few of the pit-falls! Another case of British arrogance and the "not invented here" syndrome.

Andrew Gwilt   19/12/2017 at 22:29

And there’s me proven wrong as always.

Mmlred   20/12/2017 at 10:43

What a mess, and probably a nail in the coffin of any other speculative schemes across the country.

Rich   21/12/2017 at 11:14

Why can’t I make a comment on your site from my mobile phone ??

J, Leicester   21/12/2017 at 12:56

Rich, you did, but it ended up costing five times what it should have done and it still hasn't arrived.

M'lud Mason   24/12/2017 at 11:59

This is a classic case of a good idea being designed and project managed by council committees,engineers, accountants, and politicians. Little or no railway operational input. A civil engineering firm involved, told me specialist operational input was "unnecessary", as NR would undertake that role. Really??

Add your comment

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

HS2 Ltd: Five tech firms join Innovation Accelerator initiative

11/09/2020HS2 Ltd: Five tech firms join Innovation Accelerator initiative

HS2 Ltd have announced today (11 Sept) the first five revolutionary tech firms that will join HS2 Ltd’s Innovation Accelerator programme. ... more >
Network Rail publish Decarbonisation Plan

11/09/2020Network Rail publish Decarbonisation Plan

Network Rail have released their interim Traction Decarbonisation Network Strategy, illustrating its preliminary recommendations for decarbonisin... more >
Trains kept moving by AWC despite damaged overhead wires

11/09/2020Trains kept moving by AWC despite damaged overhead wires

Avanti West Coast have taken an unlikely option to allow their timetable to run, without delays, despite damaged overhead wires. The operato... more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the... more > more last word articles >

'the sleepers' daily blog

On the right track, Sulzer is awarded RISAS accreditation for Nottingham Service Centre

29/06/2020On the right track, Sulzer is awarded RISAS accreditation for Nottingham Service Centre

Following an independent audit, Sulzer’s Nottingham Service Centre has been accepted as part of the rail industry supplier approval scheme (RISAS). The accreditation reinforces the high-quality standards that are maintained by Sulzer’s network of independent repair facilities across the UK and further afield in its global network. ... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

The challenge of completing Crossrail

05/07/2019The challenge of completing Crossrail

With a new plan now in place to deliver Crossrail, Hedley Ayres, National Audit Office manager, major projects and programmes, takes a look at ho... more >
Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

04/07/2019Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

The move to decarbonise the rail network involves shifting to cleaner modes of traction by 2050. David Clarke, technical director at the Railway ... more >
Sunshine future beckons for South Wales Railways, says 10:10 Climate Action’s Leo Murray

02/07/2019Sunshine future beckons for South Wales Railways, says 10:10 Climate Action’s Leo Murray

Smart electrification is the way to boost clean energy resources, argues Leo Murray, director at 10:10 Climate Action. Contractors are clear... more >
Ambition doesn’t have to be expensive, says Midland Connect's Maria Machancoses

02/07/2019Ambition doesn’t have to be expensive, says Midland Connect's Maria Machancoses

The TCR Midlands conference is only days away and tickets are going fast for the sector event of the year at the Vox Conference Centre in Birming... more >

rail industry focus

View all News

interviews

Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

24/06/2019Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

Andrew Haines, the Chief Executive of Network Rail, has told the Today programme on Radio 4's BBC’s flagship news programme that he wo... more >