Comment

01.11.14

Affordability and safety risk at level crossings

Source: Rail Technology Magazine Oct/Nov 2014

Martin Gallagher, Futronics Group Ltd managing director and chair of the United Nations Expert Group on Level Crossing Safety, discusses the double standards in level crossing improvements.

The growth in rail, both passenger and freight, provides new opportunities and old challenges for suppliers and innovators.

This is an exciting time for small technology companies like Futronics with experience and expertise in rail and traffic management. However, it also requires a degree of reticence and a large dose of reality before committing to any development work on the back of an enthusiastic request from a customer.

We have just received product approval for a low-cost Train Approach Warning System (TAWS), a GPS-based train location and positioning information system currently being used by signallers to support decision making. It can also be used to give train position information direct to users of level crossings.

This solves some of the railway’s greatest legacy issues: the use of telephones for permission to use user-worked crossings (UWCs) in long signal sections, and useful information direct to users of passive crossings to enable better and safer decision making.

Having been operational for over two years without incident and with reliability at 99%, it is still viewed with slight scepticism in purist quarters.

Constantly referred to as new technology, it is compared to all the SIL 3 & 4 systems that are 99.9% reliable – which nobody can create a business case for at most rural crossings.

Although it is available at a fraction of the whole life cost of these systems and is light-years ahead of the current method of operation – which imports more risk than it controls – it remains to be seen whether an affordable, incremental improvement is preferred to a policy decision that only allows for the unaffordable solution.

This really is the crux of the matter. Everyone would like 99.9%, but it isn't currently affordable. The affordable option is only 99%.

So what do you do; especially given the current process is further down the SIL 0 list than anything?

If you sit on your hands and wait for the next derailment because a commercial HGV driver didn't want to wait 15 minutes on a single track railway, it means safety for passengers, train crew and level crossing users doesn't improve or gets worse.

It also leads to huge unplanned cost and diversion away from strategic objectives.

The Office of Rail Regulation has been extremely forward-thinking in its support for affordable incremental improvements, as have RAIB and the RSSB.

This pragmatic view is common sense; and common sense and safety fit quite nicely together.

Double standards

The situation is all the more ludicrous when you consider the safety, integrity and technology being used every day at over 1,500 passive crossings to mitigate poor sighting safety issues.

Whistle boards have so many points of known failure that even the most unscrupulous salesman couldn't walk in with a straight face with one of those in the attaché case. Yet the railway is littered with numerous non-compliances and a 'solution' that goes from being ineffective during the day to effectively turned off between 11pm-7am.

Why the double standard? This has to be a reasonable question from the supply chain, who are being asked to design and produce safety improvements for under £25,000, then have them tested and go through two to three years of product approvals and managing to achieve 99% reliability – to then be confronted by contorted faces and questions about safety levels at level crossings.

Our intention is to design affordable solutions to improve safety. We have done this with the Gatekeeper Red Light Enforcement System for public road level crossings.

This Home Office Type Approved system requires no corroboration from witnesses and is completely automated, from offence detection to prosecution. It will change driver behaviour and improve safety. The datasets the system produces will also improve risk management capability and lead to far better research into this complex human factors-based subject.

Technology is fundamental to improving safety on the railway but it requires greater enablers and some more agile thinking on the customer side.

The length of time to reach product approval means the technology is never new. It also means that someone has funded project teams and development for two years, only for many of these products never to sell enough units to pay back the development costs.

The future is exciting for rail safety technology but the innovation needs to start at both ends of this telescope.

Tell us what you think – have your say below or email opinion@railtechnologymagazine.com

Comments

There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

View all News

rail industry focus

Rail Technology Magazine fuels the Northern Powerhouse with official partnership

21/11/2018Rail Technology Magazine fuels the Northern Powerhouse with official partnership

Cognitive Publishing, the home of leading rai... more >
Towards railway-specific, bearer-independent communication

17/09/2018Towards railway-specific, bearer-independent communication

Freelance transport journalist Lesley Brown&n... more >

editor's comment

23/01/2018Out with the old...

Despite a few disappointing policy announcements, especially for the electrification aficionados amongst us, 2017 was, like Darren Caplan writes on page 20, a year generally marked by positive news for the rail industry. We polished off the iconic Ordsall Chord (p32), hit some solid milestones on Thameslink (p40), progressed on ambitious rolling stock orders (p16), and finally started moving forward on HS2 (p14) ‒ paving the way for a New Year with brand-new infrastructrure to... read more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the TOC, gives RTM an update on the innovative scheme. Recognising that young people are more likely to take a risk trespassing on railway tracks, C... more > more last word articles >

'the sleepers' daily blog

Williams Rail Review: The end of saying sorry?

05/02/2019Williams Rail Review: The end of saying sorry?

Keith Williams’ ongoing Rail Review presents a golden opportunity to rebuild the industry’s weakened relationship with its users and set it on a better track for the future, argues David Sidebottom, passenger director at Transport Focus. Passengers waiting at stations today are not peering down the line looking for a strategy ... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

interviews

TfN Strategic Transport Plan: not just for transport's sake

22/01/2019TfN Strategic Transport Plan: not just for transport's sake

Peter Molyneux, Transport for the North’s (TfN’s) strategic roads director, has been leading on the development of the seven economic... more >
Exclusive: Midlands Connect and WMRE talk collaboration and investment in the Midlands' railway

22/01/2019Exclusive: Midlands Connect and WMRE talk collaboration and investment in the Midlands' railway

In the jigsaw puzzle of regional transport decision-making, there must be collaboration and compromise. Midlands Connect media lead James Bovill ... more >
Rail Ombudsman interview: RTM sits down with CEO Kevin Grix

20/12/2018Rail Ombudsman interview: RTM sits down with CEO Kevin Grix

In November, the first ever Rail Ombudsman was established in a bid to give passengers a free independent service to allow passengers to claim co... more >
HS2 train race: making the case

20/11/2018HS2 train race: making the case

Bombardier and Hitachi’s commitment to providing the best HS2 rolling stock pitch to the government was signified with the launch of their ... more >