Comment

15.09.16

Moving forward with Track to the Future

Source: RTM Aug/Sep 16

Professor William Powrie, dean of the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Southampton, gives RTM and update on the innovative Track to the Future project.

Last year, RTM reported on the announcement of a major new programme grant known as Track to the Future (T2F), aimed at improving the understanding of the underlying science and developing new analytical tools for the design of long-life, low-noise railway track systems. 

The value of the award, to the universities of Southampton, Birmingham, Huddersfield and Nottingham, is £5m from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), with a further £3.5m in cash and in kind from collaborating industry partners including Network Rail and from the universities for postgraduate studentships associated with the research programme. 

This article is a brief update and review of progress during the programme’s first year. T2F is addressing three major research challenges: 

  • Track life: track maintenance is costly in cash and carbon terms, and interferes with railway operations. T2F will explore new, low-maintenance track forms. It will develop an understanding of the relationships between track stiffness and settlement, which can be measured, and differential movement of the track, which causes performance to deteriorate. It will extend ballast life by understanding and eliminating or mitigating causes of deterioration and developing designs that will continue to perform well after deterioration has set in; and will facilitate ballast re-use rather than downcycling or disposal.
  • Switches (points) and transitions: where trains change direction and cross tracks or other infrastructure there is a complex interaction of geometry, support, wheel profile and vehicle dynamics. This is not sufficiently understood, and frequent costly and disruptive maintenance is required. T2F will draw together the key areas of ground support, switch or transition zone geometry, and vehicle dynamics for the reliable assessment of crossing and transition zone behaviour, life and maintenance needs.
  • Noise and vibration: public tolerance of vibration and noise from railways is decreasing as use intensifies, yet these are traditionally regarded as secondary in design. T2F will develop and demonstrate, through modelling and full-scale testing, a low-noise, low-vibration track consistent with reduced whole-life costs and low maintenance. 

Over the past year, in terms of understanding the science, we have developed two complementary approaches to the discrete element modelling of ballast, both of which capture how the stress-strain behaviour of ballast changes with load cycling over a range of confining pressures. This work has been published in the journal ‘Granular Matter’ as two companion papers. 

We have also demonstrated the utility of an innovative theoretical framework for understanding and quantifying the behaviour of fibre-reinforced ballast; carried out and published an initial review of current models linking trackbed stiffness to geometry deterioration rates; and carried out measurements of S&C condition and behaviour at two locations on the UK railway network, which is giving some new insights into how the detail of the crossing design affects its performance . 

The project team has also analysed a range of vehicle and track configurations, and a variety of geometrical shapes of crossing (wing and nose), to determine the best performing shape for installation on UK infrastructure in the near future, and support stiffness. Optimisation has taken current manufacturing capabilities into account but has also evaluated more radical shapes that will become feasible in the future through advanced manufacturing technology. And we have developed a large microphone array for the quantitative measurement of airborne noise from railways in different environments under different operating conditions. 

In terms of modelling, tools and outputs for more direct use by industry, we have also edited and lead authored the new Guide to Track Stiffness, on behalf of the Cross-Industry Track Stiffness Working Group. 

The team has carried out whole-life social cost modelling of the impacts of under sleeper pads and random fibre ballast reinforcement for two case study routes.  This work has shown that the indirect economic impacts of these interventions, generated by changes in factors such as lineside noise, can be greater than the direct financial impacts for the rail infrastructure operator. However, it has also emphasised the complexity of estimating such indirect impacts; for example, under sleeper pads lead to a reduction in groundborne noise but an increase in airborne noise. 

The coming year promises to be an exciting one, as we gear up for further laboratory tests; field trials of innovative ballast solutions, such as random fibre reinforcement; and we welcome our first cohort of PhD research students.

Tell us what you think – have your say below or email opinion@railtechnologymagazine.com

Comments

There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

View all News

rail industry focus

All set for this year’s ETCR Seminar

13/06/2017All set for this year’s ETCR Seminar

The ‘EU Transport and Railway Affairs&r... more >
Risk management for railway engineering

22/05/2017Risk management for railway engineering

RTM talks to Ben Shirley, health and safety r... more >

editor's comment

08/05/2017All set for Railtex

As the rail industry prepares for the biggest UK rail show of the year, Railtex 2017, we have produced a specially expanded edition of RTM for you.  Our exclusive show guide, which starts on page 67, provides you with everything you need to know about the things to see, hear and do at the three-day show. A look through our preview pages will give you a good idea of which stands to visit, as well as meetings to set up.  The RTM team – as ever – will be at... read more >

last word

Collaborative working is the key to the future of rail infrastructure

Collaborative working is the key to the future of rail infrastructure

David Hawkins, operations director at the Institute for Collaborative Working (ICW), on why ISO 44001 is a new evolution in collaborative working. The launch of BS 11000 in 2010 heralded a step change in thinking for the UK rail industry led by Network Rail. Since those early days, the benefits of a structured approach to collaboration ha... more > more last word articles >

'the sleepers' daily blog

RTM joins industry to take part in Big Rail Diversity Challenge 2017

16/06/2017RTM joins industry to take part in Big Rail Diversity Challenge 2017

Last week, a team from Rail Technology Magazine competed in the second annual Big Rail Diversity Challenge which took place on 7 June. Held at the East of England Arena in Peterborough, the event aims to promote diversity in the rail industry by having teams with equal numbers of men and women compete in a range of challenges. The ev... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

interviews

Intertrain: ready for the future

23/02/2017Intertrain: ready for the future

RTM recently attended Intertrain’s ‘Driving for Success’ event in Doncaster, where leaders from major players such as Carillion... more >
Tackling regulation at its routes

24/01/2017Tackling regulation at its routes

John Larkinson, the ORR’s director of railway markets and economics, speaks to RTM about the move to regulating Network Rail at a route lev... more >
Investing in the future of Scottish Rail

15/11/2016Investing in the future of Scottish Rail

Phil Verster, managing director of ScotRail Alliance, speaks to RTM’s Luana Salles about the recently-published ‘Investing in the Fut... more >
Maintaining the safety momentum

12/09/2016Maintaining the safety momentum

Britain’s railways are currently the safest they have ever been, but there is still room for improvement, Ian Prosser, HM chief inspector o... more >