Comment

24.11.17

Time to recognise freight's role

Campaign for Better Transport’s Freight on Rail manager, Philippa Edmunds, argues that the National Infrastructure Commission’s (NIC’s) recent report overlooks the contribution rail freight makes to reducing congestion on British roads.

The latest NIC report undervalues the socioeconomic importance of existing rail freight services and its potential to further reduce congestion, road crashes and pollution.

It ignores the fact that rail freight projects have high benefit cost ratios compared to other transport projects. And most worryingly, it suggests transferring freight back onto our congested road network, even though each HGV takes up the space of four cars in busy conditions.

Furthermore, transport is now the largest emitter of carbon dioxide emissions, meaning that the government could struggle to meet its climate change targets. And the latest DfT figures confirm again the safety case for rail freight: HGVs were almost seven times more likely than cars to be involved in fatal crashes on urban/local roads in 2016.

Suppressed demand

The report acknowledges that urban freight is often overlooked, but it does not recognise that freight should have a role in delivering long-distance consumer freight into rail-connected hubs for transhipment into low-emissions vehicles.

Rail already delivers 40% of London’s construction materials and could deliver more if extra rail freight terminals come on stream. Each freight train can carry enough materials to build 30 houses. Rail delivered the materials and removed spoil for Crossrail and the Olympics.

NIC’s research uses national averages in transport planning instead of analysing individual corridors where there are parallel rail routes, which is misleading. Furthermore, the organisation is pinning its hopes on lorry platooning, which is in its infancy for dense road networks like the UK, whereas rail freight is already removing large numbers of HGVs from key transport corridors each day.

There is considerable suppressed demand for more consumer and construction rail freight services on key corridors such as the A14, A34 and M6, so capacity upgrades could remove serious numbers of the large long-distance lorries from congested routes.

For example, the 33 freight trains in and out of Felixstowe already remove around 2,500 lorries per day off the congested A14 corridor. Rail freight could be increased by 50-60% on both the A14 and A34 out of Southampton Port within the next five to seven years based on a combination of current funded CP5 Network Rail projects and the as yet unfunded proposals in the Network Rail Freight Network Study for CP6 until 2024. Targeted rail freight upgrades work; the gauge upgrades out of Southampton Port increased rail’s market share from 29% to 36% within a year and had a benefit cost ratio of five to one.

The A14 corridor from Felixstowe had up to 6,500 of the largest HGVs (five and six axle articulated lorries) on the corridor each day, which represented between 10% and 17% of all traffic.

Integrated planning

Our DfT-sponsored research, ‘Impact on congestion of transfer of freight from road to rail on key strategic corridors,’ confirms what we have long argued: that integrated rail and road planning is the best way to reduce road congestion, collisions and pollution. It shows that on certain strategic transport corridors it is possible to improve road conditions without needing to add more road capacity. If long-distance freight can be transferred to rail, the productivity and reliability of existing road services will improve.

This research demonstrates the importance of analysing strategic corridors instead of simply using national averages in transport planning, so the NIC should take note of the findings. It shows the extent to which upgrading the rail freight network on key strategic corridors ameliorates road congestion and therefore improves productivity. Transferring freight from road to rail would also bring serious safety and pollution benefits at a time when the government needs to reduce air pollution. Rail produces 90% less PM10 particulates and up to 15 times less nitrogen dioxide emissions than HGVs for the equivalent journey, whereas HGVs account for around 21% of road transport NOx emissions while making up just 5% of vehicle miles.

Recent polling showed that almost two-thirds of the public wanted to see more freight on the railways, with only 2% wanting to see more freight on the roads, while other polls have shown deep public suspicion of autonomous vehicles.

As motoring groups have pointed out, there are many unresolved issues with lorry platooning on our congested road network. By contrast, our recent research shows that increased rail freight could make a real difference to congestion and pollution on some of the country’s most overcrowded roads. We’d like the government to give priority to increasing the use of sustainable freight modes and making more efficient use of existing trucks rather than new technology which, while technically interesting, is likely to have very limited real-world benefits.

We don’t want more lorries

Road haulage is very competitive but not efficient in the UK. Currently, 30% of lorries are driving around totally empty and many of the other lorries are partially full. The latest DfT figures show that only 34% of lorries were constrained by volume, i.e. loading space. We do not want more lorries; instead, government needs to introduce a distance-based lorry road user charging system which incentivises better use of trucks in order to reduce their adverse impacts on the economy, society and the environment.

Lorry platooning with driverless rear trucks might cut costs for road hauliers, but putting more freight on the railways would bring bigger and quicker reductions in congestion, road damage, crashes and pollution.

We urge the NIC to think again on its freight policies if it wants to help increase productivity and protect the environment and society, and we look forward to engaging with them. Road and rail complement each other and should play to their strengths. Nationally, a quarter of the largest HGVs (five plus axles) trips are over 300km so some of this traffic should be transferred to rail. Shippers and construction firms are crying out for more rail freight services which are constrained by capacity on the rail network. 

FOR MORE INFORMATION

W: tinyurl.com/RTM-NIC-CCC

Comments

Lutz   25/11/2017 at 18:11

I hope the rail industry is able to back up its claims - specifically around total cost of delivery of upgrades and time-scales to delivery - all of which excessive compared to technology evolution cycles. Get real.

Sonning Cutting   27/11/2017 at 16:55

It's all right for Lutz to have a go at the cost over-runs on recent railway updates but we never see the figures for similar updates on the roads. For example what was the 'real' cost of converting a 12 mile stretch of the M3 to 4 lanes over 3/4 years. And most people consider it more dangerous than before. Whereas that work involved recent infrastructure most railway projects concern Victorian infrastructure where no accurate records etc. are available. Hence the unpleasant surprises. Even the great IKB was remiss in this matter as we know from the GWR upgrade.

Frankh   13/01/2018 at 13:26

Ms Edmonds states 30% of lorries are driving round empty and many others partially full. Rail is probably worse than that % wise. Container trains are the only ones that stand a chance of a back load ie loaded return journey even if only an empty container. Apart from engineers trains (new in, spoil out) I can't think of any load that has a loaded return.

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

View all News

rail industry focus

Towards railway-specific, bearer-independent communication

17/09/2018Towards railway-specific, bearer-independent communication

Freelance transport journalist Lesley Brown&n... more >
The benefits of aluminium honeycomb to the rail industry

03/09/2018The benefits of aluminium honeycomb to the rail industry

Gillian Haverson, senior marketing executive ... more >

editor's comment

23/01/2018Out with the old...

Despite a few disappointing policy announcements, especially for the electrification aficionados amongst us, 2017 was, like Darren Caplan writes on page 20, a year generally marked by positive news for the rail industry. We polished off the iconic Ordsall Chord (p32), hit some solid milestones on Thameslink (p40), progressed on ambitious rolling stock orders (p16), and finally started moving forward on HS2 (p14) ‒ paving the way for a New Year with brand-new infrastructrure to... read more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the TOC, gives RTM an update on the innovative scheme. Recognising that young people are more likely to take a risk trespassing on railway tracks, C... more > more last word articles >

'the sleepers' daily blog

The East Coast franchise report tells us what we already knew: it was a bid set up to fail

18/09/2018The East Coast franchise report tells us what we already knew: it was a bid set up to fail

RTM's Jack Donnelly assesses what the Transport Committee's latest report on the VTEC franchise means for the industry as a whole “Even now, there is no concrete plan, nor timescales, for the interim operator of this franchise. From our inquiry, we cannot be sure, and cannot reassure passengers or public, that the arrangements ... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

interviews

Going global: an interview with Network Rail’s Leevan Finney

29/08/2018Going global: an interview with Network Rail’s Leevan Finney

RTM’s Jack Donnelly sat down with one of the leading minds behind Network Rail’s most advanced and innovative rail maintenance techno... more >
Transforming travel in the north west

06/02/2018Transforming travel in the north west

RTM’s Josh Mines talks to Robin Davis, head of new trains at TransPennine Express (TPE), about the huge rolling stock change journey the co... more >
Thameslink: Nearing the end of the line

23/01/2018Thameslink: Nearing the end of the line

RTM’s Josh Mines catches up with Mark Somers, project director for Thameslink, on how the final stages of the programme are progressing and... more >
Modernising journeys in north east England

09/11/2017Modernising journeys in north east England

First Hull Trains is about to embark on the biggest fleet overhaul it has delivered since being set up in 2000. Managing director Will Dunnett te... more >