Fares, rail policy and DfT news


UTG warns of unfair cost allocation to regional services

The Urban Transport Group has called on the Office of Rail and Road for a fairer allocation of costs to regional rail services.

In a letter to ORR’s chief executive, Ben Still, lead board member on rail issues for the Urban Transport Group, warned that industry processes could further shift the balance of the railways’ infrastructure costs on to regional rail services, which it says could damage their future prospects.

The decision to allocate more of the network’s overall costs to regional rail services has come following a series of industry consultations by ORR and Network Rail.

Network Rail’s recent consultation on fixed cost allocation could see Northern Rail’s fixed costs increase by 50%, whilst Merseyrail, which the Urban Transport Group says is “largely self-contained” could see its allocation increase by 66%.

Virgin West Coast and Virgin East Coast would both see their allocations reduce by 58%.

Still’s letter asks the regulator “to adopt a construct for rail costs which is to the benefit of the operators whose trains have some of the largest impacts on the cost of infrastructure provision in a way which creates artificial profits, whilst at the same time loading costs on to operators whose trains cause the least impact and which damages their future prospects, is not something that we believe is as either justifiable or sensible.”

The group’s 2014 report, ‘A heavy load to bear - towards a fairer allocation of industry costs to regional rail services,’ found that allocation of maintenance and renewal costs largely treats every passenger train in the same way, despite estimations that inter-city trains produce twenty times the amount of track damage as the most basic light weight regional trains.

It claimed that a system which allocated costs more fairly would result in regional rail receiving 28% of total government support for the railways - down from 58%.

Still warned that a series of highly technical consultation papers could risk a higher burden of the industry’s costs being placed onto services that don’t create the majority of that burden and are “least able to bear it.”

He said: “Regional rail services bring clear benefits through switching traffic from road to rail in our busy cities, historic towns and national parks.

“We need a fairer system of allocating costs to them than the one we have now, the flaws of which could be exacerbated as a result of these emerging plans,” he added.

“Lightweight regional train services do not cause the most damage to the tracks, nor require the most sophisticated signalling systems, nor do regional rail services generate the most income or receive the most investment.

“They are marginal users and this needs to be fairly reflected in the costs that are allocated to them.”

An ORR spokesperson told RTM: “We have set out proposals for consultation and will be reviewing the responses carefully.

“Our proposals included our analysis of the likely impact that any changes to charges would have on different market segments.

“We will be reviewing responses and working with stakeholders to understand the evidence they have provided on these impacts.”

Have you got a story to tell? Would you like to become an RTM columnist? If so, click here.


Lutz   18/12/2017 at 18:41

There seems a little confusion in the telling of the story or the description of the problem.

Jerry Alderson   19/12/2017 at 18:11

Cost allocation is an accountant's choice - there is no 'right' answer. The choices are between a) 'allocated' (full)', b) 'direct' and c) 'avoidable' costs. Do you a) include a percentage of Mark Carne's salary, or b) count every penny that is spent on a particular route, or c) [a hybrid version that considers avoidable costs] do you deduct from the money you spend the costs you would have to spend if you still owned the route but earned no revenue from it. The reality is that it doesn't matter. What does matter is the decisions you take having chosen one of these three methods.

Add your comment


rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Former Aston Villa chair announced as WMCA HS2 growth delivery chair

21/09/2018Former Aston Villa chair announced as WMCA HS2 growth delivery chair

Steve Hollis has been announced as the new chair of the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) HS2 growth delivery board. A former chairman... more >
Major northern station upgrade reaches phase two of redevelopment

21/09/2018Major northern station upgrade reaches phase two of redevelopment

Plans to improve the Doncaster Railway Station have reached phase two of the redevelopment process. Work has begun on the plans, developed b... more >
Northern unveils new digital train for roll-out at end of year

21/09/2018Northern unveils new digital train for roll-out at end of year

Northern has unveiled its refurbished Class 158 digital train for passengers, ahead of the new fleet’s complete roll-out by the end of the ... more >

editor's comment

23/01/2018Out with the old...

Despite a few disappointing policy announcements, especially for the electrification aficionados amongst us, 2017 was, like Darren Caplan writes on page 20, a year generally marked by positive news for the rail industry. We polished off the iconic Ordsall Chord (p32), hit some solid milestones on Thameslink (p40), progressed on ambitious rolling stock orders (p16), and finally started moving forward on HS2 (p14) ‒ paving the way for a New Ye... read more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the... more > more last word articles >

'the sleepers' daily blog

The East Coast franchise report tells us what we already knew: it was a bid set up to fail

18/09/2018The East Coast franchise report tells us what we already knew: it was a bid set up to fail

RTM's Jack Donnelly assesses what the Transport Committee's latest report on the VTEC franchise means for the industry as a whole “Even now, there is no concrete plan, nor timescales, for the interim operator of this franchise. From our inquiry, we cannot be sure, and cannot reassure passengers or public, that the arrangements ... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >


Northern Powerhouse Rail: The need for change

18/09/2018Northern Powerhouse Rail: The need for change

Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR) will be transformational for the north – it will change the way people live, work, and play. It will rebalan... more >
Innovation through people and technology

18/09/2018Innovation through people and technology

Ian Prosser, HM chief inspector of railways and director of railway safety at the ORR, picks out the key industry challenges to focus on based on... more >
Why we all must mind the gap

18/09/2018Why we all must mind the gap

Clair Mowbray, chief executive of the National College for High Speed Rail (NCHSR), explains how we can all ensure the UK’s next generation... more >
3D printing: from virtual to real

11/09/20183D printing: from virtual to real

Like so many other technological advancements, 3D printing has moved from being the stuff of science fiction, through niche industrial applicatio... more >

rail industry focus

View all News


Going global: an interview with Network Rail’s Leevan Finney

29/08/2018Going global: an interview with Network Rail’s Leevan Finney

RTM’s Jack Donnelly sat down with one of the leading minds behind Network Rail’s most advanced and innovative rail maintenance techno... more >