Inbox

21.10.15

GW electrification cost estimates treble since 2012 – could hit £2.8bn

Estimated costs associated with the Great Western electrification programme have nearly doubled since last year and now stand at up to £2.8bn, Network Rail boss, Mark Carne, confirmed today (21 October).

The cost estimate, which stood at around £1.6bn last year – and just £874m when Network Rail’s Strategic Business Plan for CP5 was published in 2012 – now range from £2.5bn to £2.8bn, although this is subject to further scrutiny and review.

Speaking at a Commons Public Accounts Committee inquiry this afternoon, Carne said he was providing a range in order to avoid giving a “frankly spurious accuracy around a single number”, given that Network Rail is only around a third of the way through the programme.

Meg Hillier MP, chair of the committee, denounced it as a “staggering” increase and questioned Network Rail’s confidence about these costs, but Carne assured he was trying to be as transparent as he could.

Carne blamed the cost spikes across the CP5 portfolio, underpinning the material cost changes in the Great Western programme, on three main facts: inadequate planning and scope definition of the project in its earlier phases; poor cost estimation, particularly around electrification projects; and less flexibility in the regulatory regime since the reclassification of Network Rail’s debt onto the public balance sheet.

He added that around 75% of total cost increases in the 2014-19 are associated with electrification programmes – the “lion’s share” of the problem Network Rail has on its hands at present.

Carne admitted that, looking back now, the way in which Network Rail set itself up for the electrification programme was not adequate.

But he said that cost estimation processes, while unsatisfactory, were done at a very early stage of design and scope of works.

Regardless, he fully accepted that the soaring costs were an extremely serious disappointment – albeit did not represent Network Rail’s performance in delivering other projects.

The Office of Rail and Road’s (ORR’s) boss, Richard Price, another witness at the evidence session today, said he stood by the fact that £1.6bn – the original estimate for the Great Western programme – was what it should take to deliver the project efficiently.

But Price said that a number of things had changed since that estimate, including a greater understanding about the conditions in which Network Rail is carrying out works.

However Hillier said that these risks, regardless of slumping productivity levels, should have been predictable by Network Rail, and accused both leaders of “falling asleep on the job” that they are paid to do properly.

Yet Price pointed to the fact that the ORR  had identified a series of risks embedded in the project right at the start of CP5 – and reminded the committee that the regulator had launched a formal investigation in March as to whether Network Rail was doing everything to address these risks.

Last week, the ORR concluded that Network Rail had not done everything it could and found systemic weaknesses in Network Rail’s handling of projects, but only enforced an improvements package as punishment.

Hillier also asked whether the nearly doubling price tag of the Great Western programme posed a risk to other projects, to which Carne responded that further details will be contained in Sir Peter Hendy’s review of CP5.

But he added that “obviously the overall cost of the portfolio of projects increased significantly”, which meant that eventually, something else had to give.

(Image from the committee hearing this afternoon is a screengrab from parliament.tv, Open Parliament Licence)

Comments

Lutz   21/10/2015 at 22:30

Have measures will do no one any good; a good clear-out is called for.

Bpward   23/10/2015 at 13:44

Stop Go Stop Go is not the way forward. Estimates should be based on clear scopes, approved designers and definite Timescales

Electrictrains   23/10/2015 at 16:26

Of course it was 'poor estimatation'. Far easier to blame shortcomings in your technical support function than actually recognise the major and continuing shortcomings in your programme management - and senior management. Because I'm sure that these hugely detailed estimates are just dreamed up in a vacuum.

Chesterfield   24/10/2015 at 21:26

What is obvious but no-one seems willing or able to put honestly on the table is that these jobs were done more cost-effectively in BR days. Estimates will inevitably turn out wrong if, to retain 'political correctness', the wrong yardstick is used. But if going forward with current cost rates, they are so high that no scheme will prove viable, so investment will stall. Its a reminder of the early days of British Railways, when the industry was saddled with enormous costs to meet political objectives, which were subsequently blamed on the rail managers of the day rather than where they really belonged.

Wimg   25/10/2015 at 18:52

"What is obvious but no-one seems willing or able to put honestly on the table is that these jobs were done more cost-effectively in BR days." Roger Ford in Modern Railways last October did , researched and explained in his own very direct fashion; GW electrification is 4 times as expensive as East Coast electrification 25 years ago, and the end is not yet in sight ..

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Clapham Junction disaster lessons are ‘fading’ from rail industry following London Waterloo collision last year, RAIB finds

19/11/2018Clapham Junction disaster lessons are ‘fading’ from rail industry following London Waterloo collision last year, RAIB finds

Errors made during the derailment of a London Waterloo train last year showed lessons learned from the 1988 Clapham Junction disaster were &ldquo... more >
Wales and Borders rail to receive £2bn government funding

19/11/2018Wales and Borders rail to receive £2bn government funding

Network Rail Wales and Borders has announced £2bn in government funding to be spent on a project to maintain and renew the Wales and Border... more >
HS2 kicks off the bid race to build Curzon Street station

19/11/2018HS2 kicks off the bid race to build Curzon Street station

HS2 has announced the start of its search for contractors to build its new £435m Curzon Street station. Around four contractors will b... more >
A transport network ‘on its knees’ is slowly catching up in the north, says Grayling

16/11/2018A transport network ‘on its knees’ is slowly catching up in the north, says Grayling

Chris Grayling has said that rail in the north is playing catch-up from “decades of economic neglect” and that whilst improvements in... more >

editor's comment

23/01/2018Out with the old...

Despite a few disappointing policy announcements, especially for the electrification aficionados amongst us, 2017 was, like Darren Caplan writes on page 20, a year generally marked by positive news for the rail industry. We polished off the iconic Ordsall Chord (p32), hit some solid milestones on Thameslink (p40), progressed on ambitious rolling stock orders (p16), and finally started moving forward on HS2 (p14) ‒ paving the way for a New Ye... read more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the TOC, gives RTM an update on the innovative scheme... more > more last word articles >

interviews

Finding positives in negative short-circuiting devices

09/11/2018Finding positives in negative short-circuiting devices

Sponsored interview  Anything that brings about safety and time-saving benefits is a valued improvement for the rail industry, which is w... more >

the sleeper's daily blog

Elizabeth Line: short-term pain for long-term gain?

13/11/2018Elizabeth Line: short-term pain for long-term gain?

Tim Bellenger, director of policy and investigation at London TravelWatch, discusses the deferred opening of the central section of the Elizabeth Line. The announcement on 31 August that the central core section of the Elizabeth Line would not be opening on 9 December was a cause for major dismay and disappointment amongst politicians and... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

Challenging the perceptions of rail

13/11/2018Challenging the perceptions of rail

Darren Caplan, chief executive of the Rail Industry Association (RIA) explains how the RIA Rail Fellowship Programme is challenging people’... more >
Data-driven rail

13/11/2018Data-driven rail

Andy Cross, director of Elastacloud, and Lucy Bealing, from the Elastacloud Rail Centre of Excellence, discuss their innovative collaboration wit... more >
Looking ahead to the Williams Review

13/11/2018Looking ahead to the Williams Review

Darren Shirley, chief executive of the Campaign for Better Transport, takes a look at the government’s root and branch review of the rail s... more >
Digital Railway: All change on the ECML

06/11/2018Digital Railway: All change on the ECML

Network Rail route programme director, Toufic Machnouk, explains why only a radically new approach to contracting will deliver a better service f... more >

rail industry focus

View all News