Inbox

02.11.15

Inbox – October-November 2015

Source: Martin Young

Subject: Network Rail, ORR and DfT bosses to be ‘held to account’ in CP5 inquiry

In light of the ORR letter to NR dated 6 August 2015, re: Possible breach of condition 1 of NR’s network licence with regard to its delivery of its enhancement programmes.

The letter states that there are 13 identified weaknesses in the way NR delivers its projects, caused by systemic failure.

I have been involved with implementing Systems Engineering – Requirements Management and Systems Integration and can only say that in my experience NR are sending out unclear signals as to the value of implementing a robust Systems Engineering management structure throughout all of its projects. If NR cannot get its act together and ensure that Systems Engineering is mandated then the existing problems will continue.

In my experience, I think that the NR L2 Engineering Management for Projects NR/L2/INI/020009 Issue 6 does not make it clear to PMs and CEMs that it is their responsibility to ensure that the project technical and operational requirements are comprehensively reviewed (front-end definition) to set a robust baseline (Glass Case), and then ensure that the design and installation teams are providing accurate verification and validation evidence throughout the GRIP stages in accordance with BS EN 50126.

Systems Engineering has not just been ‘'dreamed up’ to put increased costs and workload on PM staff, as many think. However, its concepts and potential benefits are still relatively unknown within the rail industry. It stops the 'we always do it this way' attitude by making people think consciously and challenge what they and others are doing.

So, NR; I say that it is time for you to ‘practice what you preach’ by ensuring that Systems Engineering is mandated for all new projects so that proper project costing and scope can be discussed and agreed early on with your contractors to the benefit of all parties.

 

Source: 100Andthirty

Subject: Midland Main Line electrification unpaused

This is good news. It underlines that electrification is a good thing. However, I believe it also underlines the importance of not squeezing very large infrastructure programmes into five year CP settlements. Whilst good for ongoing maintenance and renewal works, five-year plans really don't work with enhancement programmes. These need two things to happen: 1) appropriate programmes for the scale, risk and invasiveness of the programme; and 2) much better programme management and integration between NR Infrastructure Projects, NR ops, TOCs and everyone else contributing to the outputs of the programmes.

 

Source: Jb

Subject: Much-delayed Ordsall Chord legal challenge dismissed by judge

While looking forward to provision of this link, I feel the wrong decision has been taken as Mr Whitby's 'Option 15' appeared much more sympathetic to the existing historic environment.

If and when NR's proposal is built, it will leave a scar on the locality and I believe we and future generations will live to regret not taking more care of this piece of local heritage.

 

Source: Lutz

Subject: Waterloo upgrades ‘vital’ and needed now – London TravelWatch

Perhaps just as important, if not more so, is the work required to improve the reliability and capacity of the signalling system at the top end of the SWML.

There are constantly delays attributed to signalling problems anywhere between Wimbledon and Waterloo, but the planned replacement of the system was scheduled for the early 2020s. Given the lack of skilled resources in this discipline, it is questionable whether NR will be able to keep to this timetable.

Instead, the signalling changes will be a patch-work of infill/modify just as is proposed for this work. What is the likelihood of this upgrade running smoothly, and what will the reliability of the line in the vicinity of Waterloo up to the completion of the signalling renewal? Very unlikely I think.

Comments

Kevin   04/11/2015 at 13:59

I personally would like to see the GRIP process reworked and rationalised. GRIP 1-3 (initialisation, scoping and selection) would become stage A GRIP 4-6 (High Level/ Detailed Design, costing and Implementation) would become Stage B (Testing / Commissioning, Snagging and Handover) would become Stage C. Instead NR is going the other way and splitting the GRIP stages further into GRIP 3A GRIP 3B etc further complicating the processes involved and dragging them out. Its almost as if the more processes they have the more meetings they can hold to discuss them and the more time they can waste.

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Crossrail restarts dynamic testing on Elizabeth Line after series of delays

18/01/2019Crossrail restarts dynamic testing on Elizabeth Line after series of delays

Crossrail has begun operating test trains on the Elizabeth Line, restarting a crucial part of testing after months of setbacks and delays. T... more >
Unions launch campaign after closure notice served on 200-job Glasgow rail depot

18/01/2019Unions launch campaign after closure notice served on 200-job Glasgow rail depot

Rail maintenance company Gemini Rail has served a closure notice on its Springburn depot and served workers with redundancy notices, sparking uni... more >
Former Highways England manager to join Transport for the North in new director role

18/01/2019Former Highways England manager to join Transport for the North in new director role

A former Highways England manager is set to join Transport for the North (TfN) to operate as the body’s new strategy and programme director... more >
Train derailment between Sheffield and Doncaster prompts RAIB investigation

17/01/2019Train derailment between Sheffield and Doncaster prompts RAIB investigation

The RAIB have launched an investigation into a train derailment after a freight train came off the tracks between Sheffield and Doncaster, causin... more >

editor's comment

23/01/2018Out with the old...

Despite a few disappointing policy announcements, especially for the electrification aficionados amongst us, 2017 was, like Darren Caplan writes on page 20, a year generally marked by positive news for the rail industry. We polished off the iconic Ordsall Chord (p32), hit some solid milestones on Thameslink (p40), progressed on ambitious rolling stock orders (p16), and finally started moving forward on HS2 (p14) ‒ paving the way for a New Ye... read more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the TOC, gives RTM an update on the innovative scheme... more > more last word articles >

interviews

Rail Ombudsman interview: RTM sits down with CEO Kevin Grix

20/12/2018Rail Ombudsman interview: RTM sits down with CEO Kevin Grix

In November, the first ever Rail Ombudsman was established in a bid to give passengers a free independent service to allow passengers to claim co... more >

the sleeper's daily blog

5 reasons why you should be involved with TransCityRail

18/01/20195 reasons why you should be involved with TransCityRail

TransCityRail brings a unique opportunity to gain invaluable insight into what’s happening in the rail industry across the Midlands, exhibit, and place your brand in front of budget-holders whilst taking advantage of the hours of networking with senior decision-makers. 5 reasons why you should be involved with TransCityRail Midlands ... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

Repoint: revolutionising track switch

15/01/2019Repoint: revolutionising track switch

Sam Bemment, senior R&D engineer at Loughborough University, brings us an update on the Repoint project – a scheme which has transforme... more >
ORR: Defining an 'efficient' railway

15/01/2019ORR: Defining an 'efficient' railway

Ahead of CP6, Howard Taylor, cost manager of railway planning and performance at the ORR, dives deep into the regulator’s assessment of wha... more >
Network Rail & Innovate UK: Ready for the future

15/01/2019Network Rail & Innovate UK: Ready for the future

As part of its Open for Business programme, Network Rail recently teamed up with Innovate UK to give businesses a chance to win a share of £... more >
CP6: Room for improvement

15/01/2019CP6: Room for improvement

Darren Caplan, chief executive of the Railway Industry Association (RIA), assesses Network Rail’s confirmed spending plans for CP6. Th... more >

rail industry focus

View all News