Inbox

02.11.15

Inbox – October-November 2015

Source: Martin Young

Subject: Network Rail, ORR and DfT bosses to be ‘held to account’ in CP5 inquiry

In light of the ORR letter to NR dated 6 August 2015, re: Possible breach of condition 1 of NR’s network licence with regard to its delivery of its enhancement programmes.

The letter states that there are 13 identified weaknesses in the way NR delivers its projects, caused by systemic failure.

I have been involved with implementing Systems Engineering – Requirements Management and Systems Integration and can only say that in my experience NR are sending out unclear signals as to the value of implementing a robust Systems Engineering management structure throughout all of its projects. If NR cannot get its act together and ensure that Systems Engineering is mandated then the existing problems will continue.

In my experience, I think that the NR L2 Engineering Management for Projects NR/L2/INI/020009 Issue 6 does not make it clear to PMs and CEMs that it is their responsibility to ensure that the project technical and operational requirements are comprehensively reviewed (front-end definition) to set a robust baseline (Glass Case), and then ensure that the design and installation teams are providing accurate verification and validation evidence throughout the GRIP stages in accordance with BS EN 50126.

Systems Engineering has not just been ‘'dreamed up’ to put increased costs and workload on PM staff, as many think. However, its concepts and potential benefits are still relatively unknown within the rail industry. It stops the 'we always do it this way' attitude by making people think consciously and challenge what they and others are doing.

So, NR; I say that it is time for you to ‘practice what you preach’ by ensuring that Systems Engineering is mandated for all new projects so that proper project costing and scope can be discussed and agreed early on with your contractors to the benefit of all parties.

 

Source: 100Andthirty

Subject: Midland Main Line electrification unpaused

This is good news. It underlines that electrification is a good thing. However, I believe it also underlines the importance of not squeezing very large infrastructure programmes into five year CP settlements. Whilst good for ongoing maintenance and renewal works, five-year plans really don't work with enhancement programmes. These need two things to happen: 1) appropriate programmes for the scale, risk and invasiveness of the programme; and 2) much better programme management and integration between NR Infrastructure Projects, NR ops, TOCs and everyone else contributing to the outputs of the programmes.

 

Source: Jb

Subject: Much-delayed Ordsall Chord legal challenge dismissed by judge

While looking forward to provision of this link, I feel the wrong decision has been taken as Mr Whitby's 'Option 15' appeared much more sympathetic to the existing historic environment.

If and when NR's proposal is built, it will leave a scar on the locality and I believe we and future generations will live to regret not taking more care of this piece of local heritage.

 

Source: Lutz

Subject: Waterloo upgrades ‘vital’ and needed now – London TravelWatch

Perhaps just as important, if not more so, is the work required to improve the reliability and capacity of the signalling system at the top end of the SWML.

There are constantly delays attributed to signalling problems anywhere between Wimbledon and Waterloo, but the planned replacement of the system was scheduled for the early 2020s. Given the lack of skilled resources in this discipline, it is questionable whether NR will be able to keep to this timetable.

Instead, the signalling changes will be a patch-work of infill/modify just as is proposed for this work. What is the likelihood of this upgrade running smoothly, and what will the reliability of the line in the vicinity of Waterloo up to the completion of the signalling renewal? Very unlikely I think.

Comments

Kevin   04/11/2015 at 13:59

I personally would like to see the GRIP process reworked and rationalised. GRIP 1-3 (initialisation, scoping and selection) would become stage A GRIP 4-6 (High Level/ Detailed Design, costing and Implementation) would become Stage B (Testing / Commissioning, Snagging and Handover) would become Stage C. Instead NR is going the other way and splitting the GRIP stages further into GRIP 3A GRIP 3B etc further complicating the processes involved and dragging them out. Its almost as if the more processes they have the more meetings they can hold to discuss them and the more time they can waste.

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Almost 1.5 million eTickets sold six months after introduction

27/03/2017Almost 1.5 million eTickets sold six months after introduction

Newly released figures of eTicket sales have shown that over one million have been sold since the modern system was first implemented last year. ... more >
Southern completes Class 377 modifications for extreme winter weather

27/03/2017Southern completes Class 377 modifications for extreme winter weather

Southern’s Class 377 fleet has been given a major upgrade to make it more resilient to frost and snowy weather this winter. Engineers ... more >
First MTR joint venture awarded South Western franchise

27/03/2017First MTR joint venture awarded South Western franchise

First MTR South Western Trains Limited (First MTR) has been awarded the new South Western franchise by the government, which will see the introdu... more >
Award of £8.6bn civil contracts for HS2 pushed back to June

24/03/2017Award of £8.6bn civil contracts for HS2 pushed back to June

A total of £8.6bn worth of civil contracts for the first phase of HS2, which were due to be awarded next month, have been pushed back to Ju... more >

editor's comment

08/03/2017A celebration of rail achievement

Welcome to this special UK Rail Industry Awards (UKRIA) review issue of RTM. The fourth edition of the prestigious awards took place on 9 February at London’s Battersea Evolution and, once again, was a huge success.  With over 1,100 rail decision-makers in attendance, the black-tie event was a great place for networking and celebrating the success of the rail industry in the last 12 months. To see who won at this year’s... read more >

last word

Reasons to be cheerful

Reasons to be cheerful

Ahead of the major imminent reforms to the apprenticeship system, Simon Rennie, general manager of the National Training Academy for Rail, outlines the industry’s reasons to be positive about the future of skills. Those of a particula... more > more last word articles >

interviews

Intertrain: ready for the future

23/02/2017Intertrain: ready for the future

RTM recently attended Intertrain’s ‘Driving for Success’ event in Doncaster, where leaders from major players such as Carillion... more >

the sleeper's daily blog

Raising wall work at Linlithgow heritage railway site completed

24/03/2017Raising wall work at Linlithgow heritage railway site completed

Work has been completed to raise the height of walls bordering the railway heritage site at Royal Terrace and Union Road in Linlithgow, as part of the Edinburgh Glasgow Improvement Programme (EGIP). A total of £650k has been put into the project to ensure the boundary of the railway is compliant with safety standards for an electrif... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

Overcoming the challenges of e-ticketing

23/03/2017Overcoming the challenges of e-ticketing

Justin Stenner, head of technology for Heathrow Express, considers the  benefits and drawbacks of implementing e-ticketing on rail services.... more >
Breathing life back into the Connaught Tunnel

23/03/2017Breathing life back into the Connaught Tunnel

Linda Miller, former Crossrail project manager, Connaught Tunnel, reflects on the challenges of widening and deepening the vital Victorian tunnel... more >
The case for rail integration

23/03/2017The case for rail integration

Jeremy Long, CEO of European Business at MTR Corporation, reflects on how stronger integration of train and track could benefit major rail infras... more >
Getting fire testing standards right

23/03/2017Getting fire testing standards right

Richard Nowell, rolling stock engineer at the RSSB, discusses the ‘EN 45545-2 Fire testing of materials and components for trains’, a... more >

rail industry focus

View all News