Inbox

02.11.15

Inbox – October-November 2015

Source: Martin Young

Subject: Network Rail, ORR and DfT bosses to be ‘held to account’ in CP5 inquiry

In light of the ORR letter to NR dated 6 August 2015, re: Possible breach of condition 1 of NR’s network licence with regard to its delivery of its enhancement programmes.

The letter states that there are 13 identified weaknesses in the way NR delivers its projects, caused by systemic failure.

I have been involved with implementing Systems Engineering – Requirements Management and Systems Integration and can only say that in my experience NR are sending out unclear signals as to the value of implementing a robust Systems Engineering management structure throughout all of its projects. If NR cannot get its act together and ensure that Systems Engineering is mandated then the existing problems will continue.

In my experience, I think that the NR L2 Engineering Management for Projects NR/L2/INI/020009 Issue 6 does not make it clear to PMs and CEMs that it is their responsibility to ensure that the project technical and operational requirements are comprehensively reviewed (front-end definition) to set a robust baseline (Glass Case), and then ensure that the design and installation teams are providing accurate verification and validation evidence throughout the GRIP stages in accordance with BS EN 50126.

Systems Engineering has not just been ‘'dreamed up’ to put increased costs and workload on PM staff, as many think. However, its concepts and potential benefits are still relatively unknown within the rail industry. It stops the 'we always do it this way' attitude by making people think consciously and challenge what they and others are doing.

So, NR; I say that it is time for you to ‘practice what you preach’ by ensuring that Systems Engineering is mandated for all new projects so that proper project costing and scope can be discussed and agreed early on with your contractors to the benefit of all parties.

 

Source: 100Andthirty

Subject: Midland Main Line electrification unpaused

This is good news. It underlines that electrification is a good thing. However, I believe it also underlines the importance of not squeezing very large infrastructure programmes into five year CP settlements. Whilst good for ongoing maintenance and renewal works, five-year plans really don't work with enhancement programmes. These need two things to happen: 1) appropriate programmes for the scale, risk and invasiveness of the programme; and 2) much better programme management and integration between NR Infrastructure Projects, NR ops, TOCs and everyone else contributing to the outputs of the programmes.

 

Source: Jb

Subject: Much-delayed Ordsall Chord legal challenge dismissed by judge

While looking forward to provision of this link, I feel the wrong decision has been taken as Mr Whitby's 'Option 15' appeared much more sympathetic to the existing historic environment.

If and when NR's proposal is built, it will leave a scar on the locality and I believe we and future generations will live to regret not taking more care of this piece of local heritage.

 

Source: Lutz

Subject: Waterloo upgrades ‘vital’ and needed now – London TravelWatch

Perhaps just as important, if not more so, is the work required to improve the reliability and capacity of the signalling system at the top end of the SWML.

There are constantly delays attributed to signalling problems anywhere between Wimbledon and Waterloo, but the planned replacement of the system was scheduled for the early 2020s. Given the lack of skilled resources in this discipline, it is questionable whether NR will be able to keep to this timetable.

Instead, the signalling changes will be a patch-work of infill/modify just as is proposed for this work. What is the likelihood of this upgrade running smoothly, and what will the reliability of the line in the vicinity of Waterloo up to the completion of the signalling renewal? Very unlikely I think.

Comments

Kevin   04/11/2015 at 13:59

I personally would like to see the GRIP process reworked and rationalised. GRIP 1-3 (initialisation, scoping and selection) would become stage A GRIP 4-6 (High Level/ Detailed Design, costing and Implementation) would become Stage B (Testing / Commissioning, Snagging and Handover) would become Stage C. Instead NR is going the other way and splitting the GRIP stages further into GRIP 3A GRIP 3B etc further complicating the processes involved and dragging them out. Its almost as if the more processes they have the more meetings they can hold to discuss them and the more time they can waste.

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Grayling commits £5m to install digital signalling on TransPennine route

22/09/2017Grayling commits £5m to install digital signalling on TransPennine route

Passengers travelling between Manchester and York could be the first in the north to enjoy an intercity railway that uses digital signalling, Chr... more >
Aslef and GTR once again close to ending DOO dispute

22/09/2017Aslef and GTR once again close to ending DOO dispute

For the third time this year, Aslef and GTR are reportedly close to resolving their dispute on Southern services. According to a statement p... more >
£120m Glasgow Queen Street redevelopment moves into next phase

22/09/2017£120m Glasgow Queen Street redevelopment moves into next phase

The major £120m development of Glasgow Queen Street has this week entered its next phase as work is now underway to prepare redundant build... more >
TfGM gets to work on upgrades at 25 Metrolink stations

21/09/2017TfGM gets to work on upgrades at 25 Metrolink stations

Major work to upgrade stations across Manchester’s Metrolink network has kicked off this week. This first phase will see customer info... more >

editor's comment

04/09/2017A series of incredible events

There are a couple of announcements I’d like to make in this editor’s comment, which I believe could be very beneficial to many of our readers.  Firstly, the deadline is fast approaching to enter the UK Rail Industry Awards (UKRIA), which will take place on 22 March 2018 at Battersea Evolution in London.  Now in its fifth year, UKRIA continues to bring together the leaders and decision-makers running the rail ... read more >

last word

How do tram and rail passengers compare?

How do tram and rail passengers compare?

David Sidebottom, director at Transport Focus, analyses the drivers in performance of passenger satisfaction in tram compared to rail. Results published in our recent Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) have seen remarkable levels of satisfaction b... more > more last word articles >

interviews

Pushing forward with East West Rail plans

21/09/2017Pushing forward with East West Rail plans

Andy Free, head of engineering assurance at East West Rail (EWR) Alliance, discusses the recent round two public consultation on the plans for th... more >

the sleeper's daily blog

Investing in rail in the north

22/09/2017Investing in rail in the north

Rob Morris, director of operation at Siemens Rail Automation UK, runs through his organisation’s impressive track record across the north. With the Northern Powerhouse and Transport for the North programmes both firmly established as key drivers for investment and growth across the north of England, much of the region’s rail n... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

Wirral Loop: ‘one industry’ approach to minimise disruption

21/09/2017Wirral Loop: ‘one industry’ approach to minimise disruption

Wayne Menzies, head of rail for Merseytravel and chair of the Liverpool City Region’s Major Events Transport Board, discusses the recently ... more >
Crossrail: track installation complete

21/09/2017Crossrail: track installation complete

Chris Enoch, Crossrail’s railway systems project manager, discusses the complexities in the design and installation of the track system on ... more >
Ballast or slab?

21/09/2017Ballast or slab?

As HS2 moves forward, William Powrie, professor of geotechnical engineering and dean of the Faculty of Engineering and the Environment at the Uni... more >
A network of training excellence

18/09/2017A network of training excellence

Writing on behalf of the Training Alliance, Simon Rennie runs through the early results of a tight-knit collaboration agreement between key rail ... more >

rail industry focus

View all News