Latest Rail News

20.10.15

'Scrap inter-city franchising and let us bid for train paths', say TOCs

Stagecoach Group and Virgin are pressing for a new system of licensing rail operators by allowing them to compete directly on inter-city routes, which the companies claim would enhance competition and provide better value for money.

In the operators’ joint submission to the consultation by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), they call for a new approach to be piloted on the East Coast, West Coast or Great Western routes.

The proposed reform would be implemented after 2023, scrapping the current franchising system on inter-city routes.

It would also replace the existing “confused and damaging” open access regime, where the government competitively lets rail franchises but allows other operators to selectively run competing services on some routes without paying the same charges or meeting the same specification (subject to a number of ‘tests’ by the regulator). These open access operators often achieve higher performance and satisfaction figures than the franchised operators.

The two companies, which jointly own and run the Virgin Trains franchises  on the West Coast and East Coast routes, claim the current approach “singularly fails to maximise the benefits of competition for rail passengers and taxpayers”.

Their alternative plan would allow bundles of train paths to be openly auctioned by a letting agency based on a nationally-agreed capacity statement.

The operators argue this would allow for several operators to compete on a single route on a level playing field – helping decrease fares and improve services and making the most efficient use of squeezed network capacity.

The response submission said: “The improvements would significantly enhance the value for the taxpayer from its significant investment in the rail network and deliver more quickly and effectively the improvements demanded by customers, Transport Focus and the government.”

They suggested that the Department for Transport, Office of Rail and Road or an independent government body could sit as the letting agency and define appropriate conditions to safeguard operational performance, network benefits like integrating ticketing, and rolling stock allocation.

The system would also necessitate a more efficient and appropriate track access charging structure.

But they claim that franchising would still be best for all other routes – such as south east commuter networks with no open access arrangements – because operational capacity and commercial constraints render full ‘in market’ competition unviable. They also argue that this model remains economically effective throughout the rest of the network, delivering benefits of up to £7bn in 2013.

In their joint response, the operators said: “We are pleased that the CMA itself recognises in its consultation document the benefits achievable on parts of the rail network from competition ‘in the market’ rather than from competition ‘for the market’ through franchising.

“Stagecoach also believes that the stunning success of commercial bus networks in the UK provides clear evidence of the value of ‘in market’ competition to customers and taxpayers.

“There is strong evidence that competition can deliver benefits to passengers through lower fares, better service quality and innovation. It can increase rail’s modal share from the private car, its biggest competitor. Taxpayers benefit too through improved efficiency and reduced costs of delivering the country’s national rail network.

“The current confused and damaging mix of both open access services and franchised networks does not provide a level playing field, with biased track access and ticketing regimes.

“This hybrid ‘cherry-picking’ arrangement offers poor value for money and taxpayers, is an inefficient use of network capacity and, at worst, risks franchise failure.”

To support this, the operators cited the fact that the East Coast franchise has reaped significantly less revenue growth compared to other inter-city franchises over the last 15 years due to open access abstracting revenue and blocking timetable optimisation.

CMA investigation

In January, the CMA launched an examination to scope for increasing TOC competition in passenger rail services to improve service quality and value for money.

Seven months later, it published a consultation document inviting responses on four options for possible reform:

  • Option 1 – retaining the existing market structure, but with significantly increased open access operations
  • Option 2 – two franchisees for each franchise
  • Option 3 – more overlapping franchises
  • Option 4 – licensing multiple operators, subject to conditions (including public service obligations)

Last week, leaders from the Rail Delivery Group called on the CMA to reassess whether the four options it put forth to radically form the franchising system actually promote efficiency and benefit local communities.

In their response to the consultation, the group asked the competition watchdog to test all options against how effective and practical they would be, questioning how each option would deliver wider benefits to communities and their economies.

It claimed the CMA should also take into account a number of potentially significant reviews occurring in the industry currently and, in light of these, should consider adding other options to respond more flexibly to passenger needs.

These new options, according to the group’s submission, would include changing franchise contracts and improving the access process and charging structure between Network Rail and train operators.

Comments

Joel   20/10/2015 at 12:57

Great for TOCs but lousy for passengers - we'd never know which company was running which service. fares and t&c would have to be mutual and shared, including online bookings and railcard acceptance - the latter being something Virgin is so cavalier about. Passengers need stability to help plan journeys - not a bunch of over-paid cowboys out to exploit them for corporate greed. Also most people have return trips - what if I can't get a return timing which suits me on one TOC only? And if they have different t&c I'd end up paying more for the round trip simply to line their pockets. The more these privateers steal government money to pretend its their own investment, the more they skew (or similar) the fares, the more they make the case for State-ownership - not the worst of BritRail but the best of it plus the best of today, but run by 'us' for 'us'. It can be done, with some intelligent planning and foresight.

Manchester Mike   20/10/2015 at 13:35

More fragmentation of the rail sector is not the answer. Increasing what TOCs pay for rail access will only increase passenger fares.

John   20/10/2015 at 13:47

When TOCs - Bus Companies in the main - start talking about competing with each other, it rather reminds me of the Oil Companies and the Supermarkets "competing". It's a cartel and they all get together to decide what they are going to force us into paying! Yet another farce at the fare paying public's expense.

100Andthirty   20/10/2015 at 13:49

This proposal would lead to a similar situation as with local buses. Rember bus wars? Since then it's all settled down in favour of no competition and the local councils left to pick up the socially desirable but uneconomic services but with no benefit of cross subsidy. I think this idea would make sense only on lines with lots of spare capacity. Now find one of those in UK!

John Grant   20/10/2015 at 16:14

The only problem with BR was that it was run as a branch of the civil service. The system should be run in the same way as a FTSE 100 company but with the remit to give value to citizens (taxpayers/passengers) instead of a profit for shareholders. Competition should be by dividing it into regions and benchmarking them against each other.

Jak Jaye   21/10/2015 at 15:57

Vermin and Souter concerned about the taxpayer and passengers? am i reading this correct! ive a better idea,let Vermin and Co run the tracks and maintenance oh and pay for their own trains,er well good luck with that one

Add your comment

 

related

Rail industry Focus

View all News

Comment

The challenge of completing Crossrail

05/07/2019The challenge of completing Crossrail

With a new plan now in place to deliver Crossrail, Hedley Ayres, National Audit Office manager, major projects and programmes, takes a look at ho... more >
Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

04/07/2019Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

The move to decarbonise the rail network involves shifting to cleaner modes of traction by 2050. David Clarke, technical director at the Railway ... more >

'the sleepers' blog

NPR, TRU & Fleetwood Mac

18/10/2019NPR, TRU & Fleetwood Mac

Switch up your playlist with the first #WeAreRTM podcast, gain exclusive insight into the leaders running the rail industry their opinions on recent headlines, visions for the future and meet the personalities behind the job titles. It's no... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

Interviews

Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

24/06/2019Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

Andrew Haines, the Chief Executive of Network Rail, has told the Today programme on Radio 4's BBC’s flagship news programme that he would not rule out his organisation issuing future r... more >
Malcolm Holmes, executive director of West Midlands Rail Executive, announced as TCR Midlands speaker in Birmingham

24/06/2019Malcolm Holmes, executive director of West Midlands Rail Executive, announced as TCR Midlands speaker in Birmingham

Ahead of his appearance, Malcolm Holmes spoke with Rail Technology Magazine about what key leaders in the industry were doing to improve rail in the Midlands. He said: “It’s very... more >