The Last Word

01.01.13

Lowering the cost of UK light rail and tram projects

Source: Rail Technology Magazine Dec/Jan 2013

Leeds North West MP, Greg Mulholland, recently urged the DfT to make light rail standards more appropriate in a Commons transport questions session. Light rail projects are being held back by over-engineering and unnecessarily high safety standards associated with heavy rail, he suggested. Here, Andrew Braddock, chairman of the Light Rail Transit Association, expands on that argument.

Greg Mulholland’s plea for appropriate standards for light rail projects has picked up a longstanding concern of the LRTA, which has been at the forefront of campaigning for more than 75 years – initially to oppose the closure of the UK’s remaining city tramway systems and latterly to bring about the reintroduction of this eminently sensible mode of transport.

With the renaissance of the modern tram – initially in Tyne & Wear and then Manchester – we were inevitably combining light- and heavy-rail thinking and, given the dearth of experience with tramways (compared, say, to Germany) it is not surprising to find that the UK’s consultancy expertise tended towards the heavy end of the spectrum when it came to advising fledgling promoters of new schemes.

In addition, the consequences of risk transfer from public to private sector inherent in Private Finance Initiative delivery of light rail projects insisted on by the Treasury led to a cautious approach in areas like utility diversion, track formation and overhead line equipment. Advisors took the view that potential overspecification in these areas was preferable, to limit their clients’ risk of future claims by affected parties.

These tendencies undoubtedly added to costs, as did the failure to develop a common specification for new vehicles along the lines of the Tramway Standard Français across the Channel. The thinking in the Parisian equivalent of our Department for Transport was heavily influenced by neighbouring Germany’s standardised approach through the Verband Deutscher Verkehrsunternehmen standards and federal BOStrab regulations, which were perhaps regarded here as too restrictive in an era of ‘small is beautiful’ and political preference for private sector flair over dull public sector standardisation.

So today we have a situation in which just about the only common aspect of the tram and light rail installations in Birmingham, Croydon, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham and Sheffield (plus the refreshed Blackpool and Edinburgh in due course) is the 1.435 metre track gauge!

But the good news is that a recent study by UKTram has shown that overall costs in the UK are not that different to those of other European and North American new-start systems – though the make-up of the totals varies widely (for example in areas such as utility diversion). The job that UKTram is now doing, through a series of specific Action Plans and the development of a Centre of Procurement Excellence, will create a more level playing field for the future and rely, in cooperation with the Railway Inspectorate at the Office of Rail Regulation, more heavily on the adaptation of BOStrab and VDV norms within the guidance and standards applicable to, and ultimately ‘owned’ by, the UK tram and light rail industry.

If we are to benefit from the significant economic, employment and environmental advantages delivered to 21 French cities over the past 27 years it is vital that costs are lowered and past mistakes avoided. That two of our current six second-generation systems are disposing of trams only half way through what should be their economic lives is quite telling and certainly not something that encourages the Treasury to think beyond its ‘buses are cheaper’ mindset.

In Norman Baker we have a ministerial champion like no other, and his support for change through the ‘Green light for light rail’ report represents a clarion call to all parties with an interest in furthering the cause of tram or light rail systems in more British cities to positively get their act together.

There is unlikely to be a second chance.

‘Over-engineered and over-expensive’

Greg Mulholland MP said: “High safety standards are an important part of any project. However, the European standards that are currently in place for all rail projects must be revised for light rail projects.

“While I recognise that these standards have been successful in ensuring a high level of safety on the UK railway system, the standards are inappropriate for on-street tram. Having unnecessarily high safety standards has led to UK tram networks being unnecessarily over-engineered and over-expensive.

“I hope the Government will follow up on the findings of their ‘Green Light for Light Rail’ report and look again at the current European safety standards and look towards tailoring specific standards for light rail projects to ensure those who put forward applications are not forced to spend vast sums of money meeting the requirements of these unnecessary safety standards.”

Tell us what you think – have your say below, or email us directly at opinion@railtechnologymagazine.com

Comments

Henry Law   02/02/2013 at 16:52

Underground services in central Brighton were completely renewed in the late 1990s. Had there been a plan for a possible light rail system in the future, this work could have been done at next to no extra cost, so as to avoid the necessity of renewing the services in the future. Unfortunately, the opportunity was lost. However, with modern remote control repair techniques, to what extent is it still the issue it once was? When it is possible to use robots to work on complex tasks at the bottom of the North Sea, surely the lack of direct access could be overcome in the same way?

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

DfT confirms Northern Powerhouse Rail business case delayed until 2019

12/12/2018DfT confirms Northern Powerhouse Rail business case delayed until 2019

The strategic outline business case for Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR), which was due to be submitted to the government by the end of this month,... more >
TfL shelves plans for Tube upgrades as financial woes revealed

12/12/2018TfL shelves plans for Tube upgrades as financial woes revealed

Plans to upgrade major parts of London Underground will be put on hold and Crossrail 2 is now in doubt after TfL has disclosed the extent of its ... more >
Hitachi and Spencer Group join forces for £500m Tyne and Wear Metro deal bid

12/12/2018Hitachi and Spencer Group join forces for £500m Tyne and Wear Metro deal bid

Hitachi and Spencer Group have launched a joint bid to win a £500m contract to build new trains and a maintenance depot for the Tyne and We... more >
Khan told in July of ‘high risk’ to Crossrail launch date as TfL reveals project’s ‘failed governance’

11/12/2018Khan told in July of ‘high risk’ to Crossrail launch date as TfL reveals project’s ‘failed governance’

Documents released by TfL show that the former Crossrail chairman Sir Terry Morgan warned Sadiq Khan in July that schedule plans were at “h... more >

comment

Passenger safety: Respect the edge

27/11/2018Passenger safety: Respect the edge

Claire Coward, communications lead at the RSSB, discusses her organisation’s latest passenger safety campaign. Incidents at the platfo... more >
Night Tube: The twilight economy

27/11/2018Night Tube: The twilight economy

Dr David Lutton, executive director of economy and tax at London First, argues that the capital’s night-time economy is just starting its j... more >
Monitoring the performance of earthworks

27/11/2018Monitoring the performance of earthworks

Dr Joel Smethurst, associate professor in geotechnical engineering, and Professor William Powrie, professor of geotechnical engineering, both of ... more >
Introducing iPort

20/11/2018Introducing iPort

Steve Freeman, managing director of iPort Rail, introduces the UK’s newest inland freight terminal. The UK’s newest inland rail ... more >

editor's comment

23/01/2018Out with the old...

Despite a few disappointing policy announcements, especially for the electrification aficionados amongst us, 2017 was, like Darren Caplan writes on page 20, a year generally marked by positive news for the rail industry. We polished off the iconic Ordsall Chord (p32), hit some solid milestones on Thameslink (p40), progressed on ambitious rolling stock orders (p16), and finally started moving forward on HS2 (p14) ‒ paving the way for a New Ye... read more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the... more > more last word articles >

interviews

HS2 train race: making the case

20/11/2018HS2 train race: making the case

Bombardier and Hitachi’s commitment to providing the best HS2 rolling stock pitch to the government was signified with the launch of their ... more >
Finding positives in negative short-circuiting devices

09/11/2018Finding positives in negative short-circuiting devices

Sponsored interview  Anything that brings about safety and time-saving benefits is a valued improvement for the rail industry, which is w... more >
Taking to the skies

30/10/2018Taking to the skies

Network Rail’s commitment to driving innovation is best encapsulated by its latest scheme involving high-definition imagery drones, or UAVs... more >

rail industry focus

View all News

'the sleepers' daily blog

Spotlight on Coventry Very Light Rail

27/11/2018Spotlight on Coventry Very Light Rail

Olivia Brown, business development officer at Warwick Manufacturing Group (WMG), an academic department of the University of Warwick, outlines th... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >