The Last Word

01.05.15

The importance of benchmarking for cost optimisation in high-speed rail projects

Source: RTM Apr/May 15

Kimmo Oostermeijer, a director at specialist infrastructure and transport consultancy LeighFisher, says it is vital that high-speed rail promoters can demonstrate that individual projects are as cost-effective and efficient as possible.

There is no doubt high-speed rail is increasingly popular and its growth is set to continue. The global market for high-speed rail totalled £68bn in 2013 and £74bn in 2014. This market is expected to reach £88bn by 2019, registering a compound annual growth of 3.6% over the next five years. 

Countries from Poland to Turkey to Saudi Arabia are either planning or have recently opened high-speed lines, and Russia recently unveiled plans for a high-speed super highway to connect Europe and America, dubbed the Trans-Eurasian Belt Development. 

As high-speed projects grow in popularity, so too does the scrutiny they come under, especially in terms of cost. The European Commission recently opened an in-depth investigation to examine the public financing of a test centre for high-speed trains, while the proposed Californian bullet train’s $68bn (£45bn) price tag is the object of intense debate. And of course, in the UK there is the much-discussed HS2 project. While some are lauding this as a way to improve both rail capacity and north-south travel times as well as regenerate lagging regions, others object to the scheme’s £33bn proposed cost. 

This level of interest is perhaps unsurprising, as high-speed projects usually depend on an element of public funding. A positive business case, at least for the operational phase, is a requirement that ticket prices must be sufficiently low to attract a big enough user base to achieve the mobility objectives. As such, it is vital for infrastructure managers and government departments alike to be able to demonstrate that individual high-speed rail projects are as cost-effective and efficient as possible. 

Being able to benchmark performance to assess the cost effectiveness and efficiency of projects is, therefore, hugely beneficial. By analysing specific cost drivers and comparing these to high-speed railways across the world, users can identify cost optimisations and areas for improvement, ultimately leading to better decision-making. 

Benchmarking performance can be challenging, as those who have launched high-speed rail projects naturally want to protect their intelligence to maintain a competitive edge. In addition, high-speed railways are not like-for-like and there are many differentiators to take into account, such as length and characteristics of the route. 

To combat this, at LeighFisher, we have developed a new, unique tool that can deliver an independent cost analysis. This benchmarking tool compares specific high-speed railways across the world by identifying the Inherent, Structural, Systematic and Realised (ISSR) cost drivers and collecting staff and cost data for all comparators. The data is normalised for the inherent cost drivers (as these cannot be influenced by infrastructure managers). 

Using this method, cost and staff numbers per equivalent kilometre of track can be calculated, allowing for detailed comparison of effectiveness and efficiency. As such, cost optimisations in the short and long term can be identified and inform better decisions in terms of operations, staff and maintenance. 

This tool not only helps infrastructure managers demonstrate they are working cost effectively and making informed decisions to deliver more efficient and effective services, it also enables government departments to show that public funds are being well invested and managed. 

We were recently asked by a European high-speed rail infrastructure manager to perform an extensive operational, maintenance and renewal (OMR) cost benchmark, including 10 worldwide high-speed line comparators, mapping their cost to OMR activities. 

We found considerable differences with maintenance expenditure between the lowest and highest comparators, which were all directly related to decisions that infrastructure managers had made. As a result of this, we identified three main reasons for the differences: adopted maintenance strategies; maintenance staff utilisation; and ‘the learning organisation’. 

The learning organisation refers to understanding the (changes to) specific asset behaviour along the route so that maintenance processes can be tailored and optimised over time. Making even relatively small changes in these areas can have a big impact on the bottom line. We further found how choices in the development impact the operational cost, providing the insights required to design a high-speed railway with lower operational cost. 

High-speed rail is here to stay, that much is clear. It is in the interests of all involved in high-speed projects, from rail operators and infrastructure managers to government departments and passengers, for projects to be as cost-efficient as possible, not only for the initial construction but especially for the operational and whole-life cost. Having an independent, specialised way to deliver this can only be a positive move.

Tell us what you think – have your say below or email opinion@railtechnologymagazine.com 

Comments

There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Northern to launch extended compensation scheme for regular travellers

24/09/2018Northern to launch extended compensation scheme for regular travellers

Northern has launched an extended compensation scheme to include regular travellers who don’t hold season tickets following the major disru... more >
Crossrail: Khan commissions report into governance, says he ‘cannot be sure’ of completion date

24/09/2018Crossrail: Khan commissions report into governance, says he ‘cannot be sure’ of completion date

The London mayor has failed to quell concerns about the future of the city’s Crossrail project after he claimed he ‘cannot be sure&rs... more >
Former Aston Villa chair announced as WMCA HS2 growth delivery chair

21/09/2018Former Aston Villa chair announced as WMCA HS2 growth delivery chair

Steve Hollis has been announced as the new chair of the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) HS2 growth delivery board. A former chairman... more >
Major northern station upgrade reaches phase two of redevelopment

21/09/2018Major northern station upgrade reaches phase two of redevelopment

Plans to improve the Doncaster Railway Station have reached phase two of the redevelopment process. Work has begun on the plans, developed b... more >

comment

Northern Powerhouse Rail: The need for change

18/09/2018Northern Powerhouse Rail: The need for change

Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR) will be transformational for the north – it will change the way people live, work, and play. It will rebalan... more >
Innovation through people and technology

18/09/2018Innovation through people and technology

Ian Prosser, HM chief inspector of railways and director of railway safety at the ORR, picks out the key industry challenges to focus on based on... more >
Why we all must mind the gap

18/09/2018Why we all must mind the gap

Clair Mowbray, chief executive of the National College for High Speed Rail (NCHSR), explains how we can all ensure the UK’s next generation... more >
3D printing: from virtual to real

11/09/20183D printing: from virtual to real

Like so many other technological advancements, 3D printing has moved from being the stuff of science fiction, through niche industrial applicatio... more >

editor's comment

23/01/2018Out with the old...

Despite a few disappointing policy announcements, especially for the electrification aficionados amongst us, 2017 was, like Darren Caplan writes on page 20, a year generally marked by positive news for the rail industry. We polished off the iconic Ordsall Chord (p32), hit some solid milestones on Thameslink (p40), progressed on ambitious rolling stock orders (p16), and finally started moving forward on HS2 (p14) ‒ paving the way for a New Ye... read more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the... more > more last word articles >

interviews

Going global: an interview with Network Rail’s Leevan Finney

29/08/2018Going global: an interview with Network Rail’s Leevan Finney

RTM’s Jack Donnelly sat down with one of the leading minds behind Network Rail’s most advanced and innovative rail maintenance techno... more >
Transforming travel in the north west

06/02/2018Transforming travel in the north west

RTM’s Josh Mines talks to Robin Davis, head of new trains at TransPennine Express (TPE), about the huge rolling stock change journey the co... more >
Thameslink: Nearing the end of the line

23/01/2018Thameslink: Nearing the end of the line

RTM’s Josh Mines catches up with Mark Somers, project director for Thameslink, on how the final stages of the programme are progressing and... more >

rail industry focus

View all News

'the sleepers' daily blog

The East Coast franchise report tells us what we already knew: it was a bid set up to fail

18/09/2018The East Coast franchise report tells us what we already knew: it was a bid set up to fail

RTM's Jack Donnelly assesses what the Transport Committee's latest report on the VTEC franchise means for the industry as a whole “Eve... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >