The Sleeper's Blog

27.10.17

Rising complaints, changing priorities?

On average this year, more people in the UK are complaining about the quality of the rail service.

Yesterday, the ORR released its quarterly analysis of complaints received about train punctuality, ticket-buying and onboard facilities and capacity.

Although the number of complaints has only risen by about 3.2%, it is interesting to note that these complaints come at a time of high investment in the industry.

Unsurprisingly, the highest proportion (21%) of these submissions related to the punctuality or reliability of services. The next most maligned subject was ticket buying facilities, which received a larger percentage of the overall complaints than the same quarter of last year.

On a positive note, 90% of grievances were closed within 20 working days which is a slight increase in the speed of replies compared to previous years.

Submissions sent through social media have not been included in the total because the definitions of what makes such correspondence a ‘complaint’ and the resources that each operator assigns to dealing with them vary so wildly that they have received a specific report.

However, with the prevalence of social media as a platform to air grievances, it seems important to mention that the total number of complaints received through official channels has not varied hugely between this year’s report and the 2013/14 edition.

Whether this is due to a disparity between the type of complaints sent on social media compared to other forms of communication or a difference in the demographic of people who send them is difficult to confirm.

This year did see a rise in submissions relating specifically to ticket buying facilities. The ORR’s report points to four TOCs responsible for this change – GTR, South West Trains, Virgin Trains West Coast and Great Western Railway all saw a rise compared to 2016/17.

The other factors that affected the increase were complaints about smartcards and delay compensation while there was a lower proportion of correspondence about train service performance.

Overall, the report shows a gradual change in some of the issues prioritised by passengers possibly caused by variations in the way people expect to be able to access services and buy tickets.

Comments

Andrew Sharp   30/10/2017 at 15:06

So Grand Central and Hull Trains are second worse in complaints/100,000 passengers. Aren't these, with Heathrow Express, the top-scoring train companies in customer satisfaction in the NRPS? To save you looking it up, the answer is Yes - Heathrow Express and Hull Trains both have 97% of passengers scoring the service good or excellent, and Grand Central is 94%. So why are they bad for complaints? Is there a problem with the methodology? Using a rate/100 000 passengers ought to smooth out the different passenger volumes.

J, Leicester   31/10/2017 at 09:16

Speaking as somebody who uses more "regional" and "rural" routes regularly, the spike in complaints about ticket buying does not surprise me. The introduction of "penalty fare" stations in particular bothers me, if only for the inconsistency of guards. Nowadays, if you ride without a ticket it's pot luck as to whether you face A) a guard with common sense who will issue you a ticket, B) a jobsworth who will threaten you with a penalty or C) nobody at all, followed by similar treatment to B once you arrive at your destination. People want a human touch. They want to get onto a train and have someone there to buy a ticket from. They don't want to have to use a machine on the platform and then be treated like a criminal if they don't, which can happen for a multitude of reasons from it being out of order, not accepting change, arriving too close to the train's arrival to buy from the machine or there being too long a queue to use it. The lack of advice on which tickets to buy for your destination from the machine pales in comparison to the information a good guard can give you too, and the complexity of the ticketing system leads to many buying the wrong ticket, which the "B"s of my list will then chastise and possibly fine you for. At change stations, too, buying an onward ticket often leads to an inquisition from staff as to why you didn't have a ticket for your full journey in the first place, another example of passengers being treated like criminals despite honest intentions. It's just another in a long line of moves that have stripped the "soul" out of the railway and reduced passengers to a mere inconvenience, and one of the few reasons I have any sympathy for those guards striking over DOO who actually do their job as it should be done. Which would be A in my list, of course.

Bryan   01/11/2017 at 17:01

As investment in services continues, it is interesting that the type of complaints being received is changing. And, having missed a number of trains due to ticket machine queues, I am not surprised that this issue is becoming an increasing issue. The abject failure of train companies to simplify fares, and lack of ticket office staff, also means that you often don't believe that you have got the best ticket. The number of complaints received per 100,000 passengers can reflect dissatisfaction with an operator but it can equally reflect the fact that complaint addresses are well advertised and people expect a reasonable response. Having dealt with Heathrow Express and Virgin West Coast complaints departments, for instance, it is no surprise that they get a relatively high number of complaints because those complaints are taken seriously and the operator is generous with compensation. One damning insight is "When asked about how they felt about the train company after complaining, 12% of complainants felt more positive about the train company, and 56% more negative". Having worked in customer service, I know that some people will never be satisfied with a response, but that really demonstrates a failure of customer service to me.

Add your comment

 

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Workers who narrowly avoided death had no one in charge and ‘ineffective’ safety arrangements

18/12/2018Workers who narrowly avoided death had no one in charge and ‘ineffective’ safety arrangements

“Ineffective” safety arrangements and a number of unofficial working practices contributed to a group of track workers narrowly avoid... more >
Structural steelwork begins on Glasgow Queen Street transformation

18/12/2018Structural steelwork begins on Glasgow Queen Street transformation

The transformation of Glasgow Queen Street has been revealed as engineers have finished the installation of the west truss and have begun buildin... more >
Rival operators to run on same rail routes in bid to drive up competition

18/12/2018Rival operators to run on same rail routes in bid to drive up competition

Passengers will have the choice of choosing which train operators they travel with under new plans to allow rival TOCs to operate on the same rou... more >

editor's comment

23/01/2018Out with the old...

Despite a few disappointing policy announcements, especially for the electrification aficionados amongst us, 2017 was, like Darren Caplan writes on page 20, a year generally marked by positive news for the rail industry. We polished off the iconic Ordsall Chord (p32), hit some solid milestones on Thameslink (p40), progressed on ambitious rolling stock orders (p16), and finally started moving forward on HS2 (p14) ‒ paving the way for a New Ye... read more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the TOC, gives RTM an update on the innovative scheme. Recognising that young people are more likely to take a risk trespassing on railway tracks, CrossCountry and the Scouts have come together to encourage Britain’s younger generations to be... more > more last word articles >
board2

'the sleepers' daily blog

Spotlight on Coventry Very Light Rail

27/11/2018Spotlight on Coventry Very Light Rail

Olivia Brown, business development officer at Warwick Manufacturing Group (WMG), an academic department of the University of Warwick, outlines the four exciting projects currently taking place as part of the Coventry Very Light Rail (VLR)  programme. In RTM’s June/July issue, readers were introduced to the concept of VLR and th... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

Passenger safety: Respect the edge

27/11/2018Passenger safety: Respect the edge

Claire Coward, communications lead at the RSSB, discusses her organisation’s latest passenger safety campaign. Incidents at the platfo... more >
Night Tube: The twilight economy

27/11/2018Night Tube: The twilight economy

Dr David Lutton, executive director of economy and tax at London First, argues that the capital’s night-time economy is just starting its j... more >
Monitoring the performance of earthworks

27/11/2018Monitoring the performance of earthworks

Dr Joel Smethurst, associate professor in geotechnical engineering, and Professor William Powrie, professor of geotechnical engineering, both of ... more >
Introducing iPort

20/11/2018Introducing iPort

Steve Freeman, managing director of iPort Rail, introduces the UK’s newest inland freight terminal. The UK’s newest inland rail ... more >

rail industry focus

View all News

interviews

HS2 train race: making the case

20/11/2018HS2 train race: making the case

Bombardier and Hitachi’s commitment to providing the best HS2 rolling stock pitch to the government was signified with the launch of their ... more >
Finding positives in negative short-circuiting devices

09/11/2018Finding positives in negative short-circuiting devices

Sponsored interview  Anything that brings about safety and time-saving benefits is a valued improvement for the rail industry, which is w... more >
Taking to the skies

30/10/2018Taking to the skies

Network Rail’s commitment to driving innovation is best encapsulated by its latest scheme involving high-definition imagery drones, or UAVs... more >