Latest Rail News

03.07.14

Industry safety objectives set for CP4 ‘were met’ – RSSB

TheRSSB has published the safety statistics for 2013/14, confirming that the railway remains the safest form of land transport.

Nobody was killed in train accidents, although there were 11 non-passenger train derailments.

There was a drop in ‘passenger harm per passenger journey’, but an increase in workforce harm per hour worked, and in the number and risk from Signals Passed at Danger (SPADs).

The total number of public deaths on the railway, including suicides, also rose.

The figures, for the last year of CP4, mean the entire Control Period can now be compared to CP3 (April 2004 to March 2009). The RSSB said: “When normalised, all the key risk areas under the direct control of the railway show a reduction in harm over CP4 when compared to CP3.”

Chris Fenton, chief executive of RSSB, said: “While it is encouraging that over Control Period 4 improvements in safety have been recorded across the majority of measures, the industry is not complacent. The overall increase in the use of the railway means that that the possibility of accidents and harm to individuals remains and we must support the industry in improving safety.”

Technical director Colin Dennis said specific actions and plans have been developed to deal with the safety factors where the trend is in the wrong direction, such as SPADs and “events at the platform-train interface”.

The UK industry is also learning from the “ notable multiple-fatality train accidents on other railways abroad” during 2013, he said.

The RSSB picked out these key details from the 2013/14 Annual Safety Performance Report (ASPR):

• There were no passenger or workforce fatalities in train accidents in 2013/14. This is the seventh year in succession with no such fatalities. At 0.2 events per year, the 10 year moving average for these train accidents is at its lowest ever level.

• Four passengers died in separate incidents, all at stations. When non-fatal injuries are also taken into account, the total level of passenger harm was 43.1 fatalities and weighted injuries (FWI); this is 9% lower than the 47.4 FWI (four fatalities) recorded for 2012/13; the decrease is due mainly to a reduction in the number of major injuries. When normalised by passenger journeys, the rate of harm shows a 14% decrease compared with 2012/13 and when CP4 is compared with CP3, there has been a 17% decrease.

• There were three workforce fatalities; all were infrastructure workers. Including non-fatal injuries, the total level of workforce harm was 25.2 FWI, which is an increase of 10% compared with 22.8 FWI (two fatalities) occurring in 2012/13. The rate of harm normalised by workforce hours increased by 8%. When CP4 is compared with CP3, there has been an observed improvement in this normalised rate of harm of 20%.

• There were 32 potentially higher-risk train accidents (PHRTAs). This is a decrease of three on the previous year’s total of 35. The normalised rate of PHRTAs per train km for CP4 was 39% lower than for CP3.

• There were no passenger train derailments in 2013/14. This is the first year with no such derailments since recording began more than 20 years ago. There were 11 non-passenger train derailments. There were no reported injuries resulting from any of these derailments.

• The Precursor Indicator Model (PIM) provides a measure of trends in the underlying risk from PHRTAs. At March 2014, the overall indicator stood at 7.52 FWI, compared with 7.90 FWI at the end of 2012/13. The reduction was due mainly to reductions in the number of events at level crossings. When only the passenger risk proportion of the PIM is considered, the risk to passengers from PHRTAs remained essentially level. At the end of March 2014, it stood at 3.32 FWI, compared with 3.28 FWI at the end of the previous year.

• At 293, the number of SPADs occurring during 2013/14 was a 17% increase on the 250 occurring during 2012/13. At the end of 2013/14, the estimated level of risk from SPADs was 73% of the September 2006 baseline, compared with 60% at the end of 2012/13.

• At 308, the number of fatalities to members of the public was the highest recorded. Eight of the fatalities were members of the public at level crossings: two were occupants of the same road vehicle, who died when their car was involved in a collision with a train, and six (including one cyclist) were pedestrian users of footpath crossings. When CP4 is compared with CP3, there has been an observed improvement of 33% in the normalised level of harm at level crossings per train km.

• The remaining three hundred fatalities to the public resulted from trespass or suicide. This is an increase of 22 on the 278 trespass and suicide fatalities occurring in 2012/13, and the highest figure recorded. When CP4 is compared with CP3, there has been no observed improvement in trespass and suicide as a whole.

• In total, and excluding suicides, there were 36 fatalities, 440 major injuries, 11,382 minor injuries and 1,238 cases of shock/trauma. The total level of harm was 102.1 FWI, compared with 116.9 FWI recorded in 2012/13. The main cause of the decrease was a fall in the number of accidental fatalities to members of the public.

A copy of the Annual Safety Performance Report and the Learning from Operational Experience Annual Report can be found on RSSB’s website.

Tell us what you think – have your say below or email opinion@railtechnologymagazine.com

(Photo: Creative Commons by toastmaster)

Comments

There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment

 

related

Rail industry Focus

View all News

Comment

The challenge of completing Crossrail

05/07/2019The challenge of completing Crossrail

With a new plan now in place to deliver Crossrail, Hedley Ayres, National Audit Office manager, major projects and programmes, takes a look at ho... more >
Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

04/07/2019Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

The move to decarbonise the rail network involves shifting to cleaner modes of traction by 2050. David Clarke, technical director at the Railway ... more >

'the sleepers' blog

Maximising efficiency requires investment in data, but it’s rewards for rail could be extensive

14/11/2019Maximising efficiency requires investment in data, but it’s rewards for rail could be extensive

Rail Technology Magazine’s Matt Roberts explains the significant role data can play within the future development of the rail industry. Standing as a cornerstone of the UK transport network, the rail industry is forever striving to in... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

Interviews

Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

24/06/2019Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

Andrew Haines, the Chief Executive of Network Rail, has told the Today programme on Radio 4's BBC’s flagship news programme that he would not rule out his organisation issuing future r... more >
Advancing the rail industry with management degree apprenticeships

08/05/2019Advancing the rail industry with management degree apprenticeships

In answering the pressing questions of how current and future generations of managers can provide solutions to high-profile infrastructure projects across the UK, Pearson Business School, part of... more >