Latest Rail News

01.09.17

Carne: I’m determined for private sector to directly invest in railway

I have always firmly believed improving Britain’s railway is vital for economic growth, jobs and housing. The railway has been growing by 3-4% for 20 years, representing the fastest level of growth in the last hundred years – and passenger numbers could double over the next 25 years. Mega projects like the Thameslink Programme, the Great North Rail Project, Edinburgh Glasgow Improvement Programme, Crossrail, Great Western electrification, and Waterloo and South West Upgrade are on their final laps, and passengers will see a transformation in services in the next 18 months as much needed capacity with new, more frequent and longer trains come on stream. 

Network Rail is now delivering almost a quarter of all infrastructure investment in the UK. This is the biggest investment programme in generations – £130m every single week – and we do this in just a few short hours at night so the railway can keep serving 4.5 million passengers safely, every day. 

But there is huge demand for even more projects – many of them local improvements. Community leaders and developers that I talk to, up and down the country, say that they want more stations, railways reopened, better connectivity and faster journeys. And, worryingly, they consistently say that Network Rail is often an impediment to their ambitions rather than a welcoming partner.  Increasingly we will be dependent on the funding from the communities that directly benefit from better railways, so it is right that they have a greater say in the way that projects are delivered. We know we have to change, and that is why I’ve been pushing to break down the actual and perceived barriers to entry for those that would like to fund and build projects on our railway. 

That’s why, back in December 2016, I commissioned the Hansford Review to investigate how we can encourage competition into railway projects and attract more private sector involvement to fund and finance Britain’s railway projects. In July, we announced the findings of that review and a swathe of necessary reforms that will enable companies to become more heavily involved in delivering railway investment projects.

engineering works - EGIP piling (1)

I want to create an environment where innovative third-party companies can compete for, and directly deliver, railway projects. Some of the reforms include: 

  • Publishing a regular pipeline of third-party project opportunities
  • Creating a swathe of third-party project champions across the country who will work side-by-side with delivery bodies, investors and funders to ensure their projects are successful
  • Creating a clear service-level agreement for third parties so they have clarity and reassurance regarding Network Rail’s legal obligations
  • Introducing flexibility to railway standards. Safety, of course, will always be central to our ethos. But where we can encourage innovation and reduce costs without compromising our solid safety record, we will explore how we can be more flexible
  • Launching a rewards scheme where money saved from introducing a new idea or innovation is shared between Network Rail and the company or individual 

By the end of 2017 our routes will have published the first ‘pipelines’ of projects they intend to put out to market – and we will also be working with government on producing a list of third-party opportunities. Initially these may be at the smaller end of the spectrum, such as new stations, depots and car parks. Examples may include new stations planned at Warrington West, Reading Green Park, Bow Street in Ceredigion and Horden in County Durham. We also have aspirations to include other projects, for example the construction of improved rail links to support power generation plants, such as in Cumbria, or the construction of Sizewell C in Anglia. Over time, we will be able to use learning from initial projects delivered in this way to develop best practice criteria for when to adopt this approach. 

I am also determined to find ways for the private sector to directly invest in railway projects. As a government-owned business, this has some challenges. But by unlocking private finance we can potentially deliver railway improvements for passengers and communities that would otherwise not be possible by reducing the burden on central government and taxpayers. 

Network Rail engineering work (1)

One of the first examples of projects being privately financed can be seen in the Digital Railway programme. We’ve now arranged an innovative two-year deal with Resonate – the British signalling and train control specialists – who are installing a new delay-busting traffic management system on the Great Western Railway to boost performance between London Paddington and Bristol Parkway

Together, we’ve agreed an innovative and groundbreaking way to finance the project so the cost to Network Rail and the taxpayer is minimal and the financial benefits will be shared. In practice, this means Resonate is picking up much of the costs to install and run the system. This is part of the early phases of the Digital Railway revolution, as we’re predicting reactionary delays could reduce by up to 15% on the main lines out of London Paddington. This will reduce the compensation paid to TOCs – and the money saved will be shared between Network Rail and Resonate. 

I am sure that there are many other potential examples like this, and my message to the supply chain is ‘we are open for business’. Come and tell us how you can save money or improve services and we will work with you to make this happen.

Comments

Samir   01/09/2017 at 10:46

First, does this guy not understand that there is not railway in the world that makes a profit, so any concept of private 'investment' is just a cover for stealing public funds for corporate mismanagement? Why are there now over 3000 companies involved with the UK rail infrastructure? A massive waste of resources and multi 'management agency' structures. Second, where is the plan to try and cut commuting? A big problem with the UK is that industries are allowed to build where the people aren't so everyone has to commute more, creating more of a mess. Third, much of the big infrastructure will not save anyone time. Take the HS2 link, with its few stops, or the HS3 Liverpool Hull plan; the few stops mean most commuters will have to get a branch into the city to catch the fast train, making the journey slower than present. More of the old lines need opening, Liverpool Hull needs passing places built for fast trains, to avoid the E Anglia problem of fast trains stuck behind slow, no need for 20 year projects that will not solve current problems

Mark Hare   01/09/2017 at 11:26

@Samir - Commuting has increased due to the rise in house prices more than anything else, and as for your claim that HS2 will 'not save anyone time' - since when has HS2 been a commuter line?? HS2 is about increasing capacity on the north-south corridor and relieving pressure on current lines such as the WCML. It would be rather pointless building a High Speed line at great expense and then clogging it up with stopping services!

Jon   01/09/2017 at 12:45

Sounds extremely similar to what we already have. You get the feeling this is warming us up to sell off more assets, which future generations will ultimately pay for... You get the feeling we've returned to the bad old days of strong right/strong left politics, where Labour want fully a nationalised railway and Tories want it fully privatised.

Paul B   02/09/2017 at 14:47

Will any of these partners be OHLE installation engineers? They may be somewhat cynical regarding the strength of Network Rail's commitments towards its "pipeline of work".

Jimbo   03/09/2017 at 10:12

The public sector tends to forget is that private sector is only in it to make a profit and the amount of risk they are willing to take on is proportional to the amount of profit they can make. They will always try to maximise profit and minimise risk, and in doing so, can come up innovative solutions. The public sector should be able to do it cheaper than the private sector because they don't have to make a profit, but it is that pressure to increase profit and decrease risk which forces the private sector to often be more efficient and innovative. The problem comes when the private sector cannot see a way of being more efficient or innovative and so just puts in an average bid for the work with their profit margin in top. The public sector is by then so locked into using the private sector, they can't take a step back and see if they can do it cheaper themselves, which then costs the public purse than it should, which results in stories about how the private sector is ripping of the public. So if the public sector understands how the private sector works and can engage with them when they offer value, and disengage when they don't, everything will be fine. Will this happen with Network Rail? I don't think so because just like the rest of the public sector, they don't think like the private sector.

SCOTTIE   12/09/2017 at 14:19

Who is that person in the Picture ? It is certainly NOT Mark Carne ! I should know as I have met the real Mr Carne I am appalled at the distinct lack of professionalism shown by RTM magazine. Does no-one ever proof read there ! :-(

Add your comment

 

related

Rail industry Focus

View all News

Comment

The challenge of completing Crossrail

05/07/2019The challenge of completing Crossrail

With a new plan now in place to deliver Crossrail, Hedley Ayres, National Audit Office manager, major projects and programmes, takes a look at ho... more >
Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

04/07/2019Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

The move to decarbonise the rail network involves shifting to cleaner modes of traction by 2050. David Clarke, technical director at the Railway ... more >

'the sleepers' blog

On the right track, Sulzer is awarded RISAS accreditation for Nottingham Service Centre

29/06/2020On the right track, Sulzer is awarded RISAS accreditation for Nottingham Service Centre

Following an independent audit, Sulzer’s Nottingham Service Centre has been accepted as part of the rail industry supplier approval scheme (RISAS). The accreditation reinforces the high-quality standards that are maintained by Sulzer’s... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

Interviews

Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

24/06/2019Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

Andrew Haines, the Chief Executive of Network Rail, has told the Today programme on Radio 4's BBC’s flagship news programme that he would not rule out his organisation issuing future r... more >
Advancing the rail industry with management degree apprenticeships

08/05/2019Advancing the rail industry with management degree apprenticeships

In answering the pressing questions of how current and future generations of managers can provide solutions to high-profile infrastructure projects across the UK, Pearson Business School, part of... more >