The Sleeper's Blog

05.02.19

Williams Rail Review: The end of saying sorry?

Source: RTM Dec/Jan 19

Keith Williams’ ongoing Rail Review presents a golden opportunity to rebuild the industry’s weakened relationship with its users and set it on a better track for the future, argues David Sidebottom, passenger director at Transport Focus.

Passengers waiting at stations today are not peering down the line looking for a strategy or review; they just want the train to arrive as promised. But significant change is in the air, and it’s vital this focuses on the needs of passengers – who are now the main funder of the day-to-day railway.

After all the disruption endured last summer, passengers were rightly looking for evidence of lessons learned when the latest set of timetable changes took effect in early December. Mercifully, it seems the mistakes that led to May’s crisis were not repeated, though ongoing performance problems remain a serious challenge for passengers on some parts of the network.

Without preempting the outcome of the Rail Review, when Stephen Glaister published the final conclusions of his review into the timetable debacle, Transport Focus asserted that, sooner rather than later, it’s essential for one specific person to be placed clearly in charge of major timetable changes. This role would help ensure robust oversight of the planning process and must have the power to hit the stop button when it’s clear something isn’t going to work.

With passengers now pouring over £10bn a year into the rail industry alongside significant government investment, the sector cannot argue it lacks the means to deliver long-term improvements.

The key question now is: how and when will all this cash translate into a more reliable railway that offers passengers better value for money? After yet another round of fare rises, nothing less will recover genuine public trust in the services that the railway is paid by passengers to deliver.

In the meantime, it’s crucial that passengers see the hefty £15m fine levied on Govia Thameslink Railway – and the money taken from Network Rail in the north for poor performance – spent well and in a transparent manner on benefits that the travelling public can see or feel. For example, more effort to automate Delay Repay and to promote awareness of it via station or in-train announcements when services are delayed past the threshold, and more investment to improve complaint handling.

Likewise, as the most recent feedback from our Transport User Panel makes plain, it’s vital that train operators make more effort to ensure everyone eligible for industry-wide compensation claims it.

Looking back over 2018, few passengers will have much faith that the railway will ever operate as a coherent whole – let alone more than the sum of its parts. Nor may many have great expectations for the fundamental DfT-commissioned review of the way the railways are structured, financed, and run.

But on behalf of passengers, that loss of trust is precisely what makes the Williams Review so important, and his deliberate focus on what passengers want so valuable. 

Having made contact promptly with the review team at the department, Transport Focus’ chief executive Anthony Smith went walkabout with Keith Williams at London Victoria one Friday morning in November. The purpose of this meet-up was to explain the importance of placing the passenger perspective front and centre.

Williams is also coming to a Transport Focus board meeting in public on 12 March, where we can take the discussion on behalf of passengers further. Likewise, Transport Focus will also feed its latest research into the review, including insight gleaned from the next wave of the National Rail Passenger Survey due 29 January.

The goal here will not be to design a new railway, but to set out what passengers want any new structure to deliver, how they want to be engaged, and their broad views on future fares and ticketing. There will also be a summary of what is known about why people do not use rail. 

Transport Focus is also undertaking some new research looking at passengers’ attitudes towards the existing structure, as well as how they think services should be provided and delivered in future. As part of this, we will hold focus groups around the country and do some online survey work to dig a bit deeper into issues identified.

This new research revisits an area of work done in 2004 by the Rail Passenger Council, which probed views on things like devolution and accountability. That study found that people were more interested in day-to-day performance than in whoever ran or owned various parts of the railway.

It will be interesting to see how far these views of the rail sector may have changed over the past 14 years, a period during which rail became a more political beast than before – even without the summer 2018 timetable crisis, social media, or various other factors that may have shifted opinion.

Passengers are looking to the Rail Review to deliver significant change that makes the railway better value for money and more reliable. A sticking plaster solution will not work this time.

 

Enjoying RTM? Subscribe here to receive our weekly news updates or click here to receive a copy of the magazine!

Comments

There are no comments. Why not be the first?

Add your comment

 

related

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Scrap HS2 and use its £56bn budget to fund 28 alternative projects, urges TPA

14/05/2019Scrap HS2 and use its £56bn budget to fund 28 alternative projects, urges TPA

Scrapping the £56bn HS2 project could pave the way for 28 separate local infrastructure schemes to be funded instead with the case “g... more >
DfT calls for new technology to transform transport accessibility, but union warns against ‘faceless’ railway

14/05/2019DfT calls for new technology to transform transport accessibility, but union warns against ‘faceless’ railway

The DfT has called for new technologies to revolutionise travel for older people and those with disabilities, but the RMT has “reacted with... more >
First leg of HS2 ‘passing the point of no return’ due to amount of money already invested, says NAO head

13/05/2019First leg of HS2 ‘passing the point of no return’ due to amount of money already invested, says NAO head

HS2 is on the “verge of passing the point of no return” and the amount of money spent would make scrapping the flagship project &ldqu... more >

editor's comment

23/01/2018Out with the old...

Despite a few disappointing policy announcements, especially for the electrification aficionados amongst us, 2017 was, like Darren Caplan writes on page 20, a year generally marked by positive news for the rail industry. We polished off the iconic Ordsall Chord (p32), hit some solid milestones on Thameslink (p40), progressed on ambitious rolling stock orders (p16), and finally started moving forward on HS2 (p14) ‒ paving the way for a New Ye... read more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. Chris Leech MBE, business community manager at the TOC, gives RTM an update on the innovative scheme. Recognising that young people are more likely to take a risk trespassing on railway tracks, CrossCountry and the Scouts have come together to encourage Britain’s younger generations to be... more > more last word articles >
board2

'the sleepers' daily blog

Making the railways safer and more reliable with Ze-Power

13/05/2019Making the railways safer and more reliable with Ze-Power

Professor Meiling Zhu, chair of mechanical engineering and head of the Energy Harvesting Research Group (EHRG) at the University of Exeter, introduces us to Ze-Power (Zero Power, Large Area Rail Track Monitoring): an innovative Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) funded project aiming to make the railway tracks safer and... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

The railway franchising model is broken, and passengers are paying the price

13/05/2019The railway franchising model is broken, and passengers are paying the price

Meg Hillier, MP for Hackney South and Shoreditch and chair of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), gives her view on the state of the UK’s ... more >
NSAR: Tackling the digital skills shortage

13/05/2019NSAR: Tackling the digital skills shortage

The National Skills Academy for Rail (NSAR) chief executive Neil Robertson returns to write for RTM, this time, to assess the digital skills shor... more >
Delivering cost-effective electrification

13/05/2019Delivering cost-effective electrification

David Clarke, technical director of the Railway Industry Association (RIA), sets out the findings of a new report on how rail electrification can... more >
5G: An opportunity to revolutionise on-train connectivity

13/05/20195G: An opportunity to revolutionise on-train connectivity

Simon Holmes, group head of digital (engineering) at FirstGroup, introduces us to the 5G solution being delivered for the rail sector.  ... more >

rail industry focus

View all News

interviews

Advancing the rail industry with management degree apprenticeships

08/05/2019Advancing the rail industry with management degree apprenticeships

In answering the pressing questions of how current and future generations of managers can provide solutions to high-profile infrastructure projec... more >
Women in rail - is the industry on the right track?

12/03/2019Women in rail - is the industry on the right track?

RTM sits down with Samantha Smith, sole female member of the TransPennine Route Upgrade Alliance Leadership Team, to find out more about encourag... more >
TfN Strategic Transport Plan: not just for transport's sake

22/01/2019TfN Strategic Transport Plan: not just for transport's sake

Peter Molyneux, Transport for the North’s (TfN’s) strategic roads director, has been leading on the development of the seven economic... more >