Latest Rail News

16.04.15

‘We’ve never done this kind of thing before’ says McLoughlin as electrification costs rise

The transport secretary says the reason that the Great Western Main Line electrification is over-budget is because “we've never done this kind of thing before”.

On a campaign visit to Cardiff, Patrick McLoughlin told BBC Wales: "We are doing in excess of 850 miles and we are working with the Assembly with the Valleys lines.

"Obviously we need to keep an eye on cost, but I hope as we get on with the job we can keep a control on those costs.

"There will be some cost increases because we've never done this kind of thing before."

McLoughlin added that the electrification plans were "value for money" and stressed that he hoped to meet the 2018 deadline for completion.

Speaking to the transport select committee in March, where he also said he “hoped” it would be completed on time, he mentioned the fact that the route goes through “several World Heritage sites” and some “very difficult tunnels”, and acknowledged the widely-reported “cost increase” in the project. He noted that the scheme involved 15,000 foundations, 14,000 masts, 1,500 signal upgrades and 50 station improvements.

The select committee warned that other electrification projects “should not be put at risk due to the projected overspend on the Great Western Main Line”.

McLoughlin added that he would be keeping up the “pressure” on Network Rail and the Office of Rail Regulation to ensure the project is completed to schedule.

Last year, RTM reported that Network Rail chief executive Mark Carne told the DfT that costs had swollen to £1.5bn, far beyond the original £600m estimate, the £874m predicted in the Strategic Business Plan, or the more recent £1bn estimate. 

(Image source: Stefan Wermuth/PA Wire)

Tell us what you think – have your say below or email opinion@railtechnologymagazine.com

Comments

Joel   17/04/2015 at 12:06

"in excess of 850 miles?" - nice to know politicians still try it on. He's hiding that it's 850 track miles, not route miles, and we HAVE don it before. Otherwise there would be no 'knitting' between London and Edinburgh/Glasgow. This is corrupt use of statistics, relying on public ignorance of fact to excuse incompetent planning - major infrastructure projects have to be under-priced to meet 'benefit:cost ratio' returns, because each analysis is completed on too narrow a focus and too short a timescale. This is deceit on as grand a scale as any other policy failure, but where the objective is still one where there is national benefit.

Tony   18/04/2015 at 09:18

What a load of old tosh Josh. Predicting costs on these sort of complicated engineering works has always been difficult. What matters in the end is to get the job done even though it may cost more! This has been a long overdue upgrade. Slagging off the minister for no real reason is not at all helpful and I'm afraid it is a particular British thing. Maybe you have some sort of political nasty agenda.Josh?

Joel   07/05/2015 at 12:04

Not tosh, 'Josh' (and I'm not 'Josh' either). I worked for long enough in planning (and building) major transport projects, so I'm keying from bitter experience of spineless senior managers and tunnel-visioned politicians of all hues. We have a nationally-flawed evaluation process for major infrastructure projects (fact) to keep accountants happy, notably in the Treasury. If I have a political agenda, I'll spell it out clearly and unambiguously; if I have a statement based on fact and experience, that too will be in the same manner. Which of the two options does my original fit, please?

Add your comment

 

related

Rail industry Focus

  • 15/11/2019A workforce which reflects society

    Loraine Martins MBE, Director of Diversity and Inclusion at Network Rail, joins us in the studio for the third episode of our RTM podcast, talking at length about her role and how it came about...
  • 02/11/2019Monica Barbosa: Women In Rail

    Director of business development and communications at Xrail, Monica Barbosa, thinks women are missing out on exciting opportunities because the lack of gender diversity in the rail industry.
View all News

Comment

The challenge of completing Crossrail

05/07/2019The challenge of completing Crossrail

With a new plan now in place to deliver Crossrail, Hedley Ayres, National Audit Office manager, major projects and programmes, takes a look at ho... more >
Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

04/07/2019Preparing the industry to deliver trains for the future

The move to decarbonise the rail network involves shifting to cleaner modes of traction by 2050. David Clarke, technical director at the Railway ... more >

'the sleepers' blog

Maximising efficiency requires investment in data, but it’s rewards for rail could be extensive

14/11/2019Maximising efficiency requires investment in data, but it’s rewards for rail could be extensive

Rail Technology Magazine’s Matt Roberts explains the significant role data can play within the future development of the rail industry. Standing as a cornerstone of the UK transport network, the rail industry is forever striving to in... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

Interviews

Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

24/06/2019Andrew Haines, CE of Network Rail, tells BBC News his organisation could issue future rail franchises

Andrew Haines, the Chief Executive of Network Rail, has told the Today programme on Radio 4's BBC’s flagship news programme that he would not rule out his organisation issuing future r... more >
Malcolm Holmes, executive director of West Midlands Rail Executive, announced as TCR Midlands speaker in Birmingham

24/06/2019Malcolm Holmes, executive director of West Midlands Rail Executive, announced as TCR Midlands speaker in Birmingham

Ahead of his appearance, Malcolm Holmes spoke with Rail Technology Magazine about what key leaders in the industry were doing to improve rail in the Midlands. He said: “It’s very... more >