Latest Rail News

20.11.15

Network Rail admits it was ‘overly ambitious’ with CP5 projects

Network Rail has admitted it was “overly ambitious” in what it could achieve with the funds and resources available in CP5. 

Responding to the Public Accounts Committee’s (PAC’s) report into Network Rail’s investment programme, the infrastructure owner stated that its “understanding of how best to plan and deliver major new electrification schemes was not good enough”. 

According to the PAC, the DfT, Network Rail and ORR agreed to an “unrealistic” programme of rail investment for CP5 that contained “too much uncertainty” on the costs of many large projects when it was signed off. 

During the Committee’s inquiry, Mark Carne also revealed that the expected cost for Great Western electrification had increased by up to £1.2bn from the £1.6bn agreed in 2014. This means the cost range is now between £2.5bn and £2.8bn. 

The MPs said it is “not clear” whether the cost escalation is due to Network Rail inefficiency, ORR lacking a full understanding of the work needed, or a combination of both. 

The Committee is now calling for Network Rail it to embed “much tighter” project planning, costing and cost control throughout the organisation. It must also be “clearer” with the DfT about what can and cannot be afforded. 

Following the “unacceptable” cost increase on Great Western electrification, it has been recommended that the DfT and Network Rail publish an updated schedule and cost forecast for the project – along with a full account of what has caused the cost increases to date and proposals for controlling future costs. 

PAC added that there is still “far too much uncertainty” on costs and eventual delivery dates for the other two major rail electrification programmes in the 2014-2019 programme: TransPennine and Midland Main Line, which have now been delayed into CP6. 

Sir Peter Hendy’s review of these and the other rail enhancement planned for CP5, which is to be published towards the end of this year, will bring more bad news on costs, said the MPs. 

A Network Rail spokesperson told RTM: “It is clear that we, as an industry, were overly ambitious about what could be accomplished with the funds and resources available to deliver the high levels of investment which will enable our railway to continue to cater for growing numbers of passengers and support economic growth. 

“Network Rail has successfully delivered over 5,000 projects over the past five years, but our understanding of how best to plan and deliver major new electrification schemes was not good enough. We have now made significant changes to the way we plan and deliver our investment programme, which will see schemes progress only once they are sufficiently developed that a reliable cost estimate can be established. 

“Sir Peter Hendy’s report on the deliverability of the current investment plan will be published later this month.” 

Additionally, for the next planning round of rail investment, and in all future investment planning, the government must assure itself that its plans can be delivered, stated the Committee. It has now called on the DfT and ORR to “assess and explain how uncertainty in key projects could affect the plan’s overall costs and schedule” for all rail spending decisions. 

PAC added that the five-year rail investment planning and funding model, which is appropriate for ongoing operations, maintenance and renewals, is “not adequate” for major enhancement work such as the current electrification schemes. 

In respect of this, the MPs want the ORR and DfT to put in place “sharper accountability arrangements” for major enhancement projects, such as the Great Western Main Line electrification, and agree principles on when it is appropriate to fund and manage these projects outside the five year rail funding cycle. 

A DfT spokesperson said: “We are proud to have a hugely ambitious investment programme, but agree that lessons should be learned on all sides. 

“We are committed to seeing the £38bn programme through and delivering the railway passengers deserve. That’s why the secretary of state asked Dame Colette Bowe to look at the lessons learned and make recommendations on what can be done better in future, and why Sir Peter Hendy is developing proposals to get the rail upgrade programme back on track and ensure it is both affordable and deliverable. Both reports will be published later in the autumn. We will respond to the PAC in due course.”

Comments

Huguenot   20/11/2015 at 17:10

On GW electrification, even when Network Rail did think it could achieve it to the original timescale, why didn't it concentrate on one route first, e.g. London to Bristol TM via Bristol Parkway, instead of pressing ahead on several fronts including the Chippenham route and the Berks & Hants? At least then it might have achieved something for the IEP to run on. Instead, the taxpayer is going to be paying for the Class 800s to be languishing in sidings whilst the wires go up.

Andy Ellis   23/11/2015 at 08:28

Network Rail, and the Government's “understanding of how best to plan and deliver major new electrification schemes was not good enough” surprise, surprise! That's because they haven't done any on anywhere near the scale of Midland Main Line, never mind GWML, for 30 years. When East Coast Main Line electrification was finished in the 1980's the Engineers said give us a rolling programme and let us carry on! Privatisation, through separation of trains and track destroyed any coherent business plan for electrification as all the cost sits with Network Rail and all the benefit sits with the train operating companies which is why it has taken so long to get electrification going again. Then to try to do it all at once was a nonsense. A railway is a long term high investment business and its funding cannot be run to short term political time scales. This was why British Rail could never deliver it's five and ten year plans, government kept hold of the purse strings and only released funds on a yearly basis, we cannot afford to go back to those days either! Similarly HS2 has been totally miss sold by the politicians, it is not about journey times, it is the natural expansion and growth of the UK rail network to modern standards. The message that should have been communicated is how many miles of major trunk roads and motorways have been built in the last 50 years and how many miles of mainline railway have been built over the same period? I would rather have a railway at the bottom of my garden than a motorway.

Add your comment

 

related

rail technology magazine tv

more videos >

latest rail news

Potential Leicester to Coventry rail link mulled over in updated Leicestershire transport vision

22/02/2019Potential Leicester to Coventry rail link mulled over in updated Leicestershire transport vision

The potential of a Leicester to Coventry rail link has been revived again as one of the key highlights of a new transport masterplan outlined by ... more >
Queues of 15,000 and Eurostar chaos at St Pancras in no-deal Brexit

22/02/2019Queues of 15,000 and Eurostar chaos at St Pancras in no-deal Brexit

Eurostar queues of up to 15,000 passengers could mount up at London’s St Pancras International station in the event of a no-deal Brexit, ac... more >
New head of safety and environment for Hull Trains announced

21/02/2019New head of safety and environment for Hull Trains announced

A new head of safety and environment has been announced by Hull Trains, with Mark Shepherd due to replace Phil Green in the role. Bringing m... more >

editor's comment

23/01/2018Out with the old...

Despite a few disappointing policy announcements, especially for the electrification aficionados amongst us, 2017 was, like Darren Caplan writes on page 20, a year generally marked by positive news for the rail industry. We polished off the iconic Ordsall Chord (p32), hit some solid milestones on Thameslink (p40), progressed on ambitious rolling stock orders (p16), and finally started moving forward on HS2 (p14) ‒ paving the way for a New Ye... read more >

rail industry focus

View all News

interviews

TfN Strategic Transport Plan: not just for transport's sake

22/01/2019TfN Strategic Transport Plan: not just for transport's sake

Peter Molyneux, Transport for the North’s (TfN’s) strategic roads director, has been leading on the development of the seven economic... more >
Exclusive: Midlands Connect and WMRE talk collaboration and investment in the Midlands' railway

22/01/2019Exclusive: Midlands Connect and WMRE talk collaboration and investment in the Midlands' railway

In the jigsaw puzzle of regional transport decision-making, there must be collaboration and compromise. Midlands Connect media lead James Bovill ... more >
Rail Ombudsman interview: RTM sits down with CEO Kevin Grix

20/12/2018Rail Ombudsman interview: RTM sits down with CEO Kevin Grix

In November, the first ever Rail Ombudsman was established in a bid to give passengers a free independent service to allow passengers to claim co... more >

last word

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

Encouraging youngsters to be safe on the railway

This summer, Arriva Group's CrossCountry and the Scout Association joined to launch a new partnership to promote rail safety among young people. ... more > more last word articles >

'the sleepers' daily blog

Williams Rail Review: The end of saying sorry?

05/02/2019Williams Rail Review: The end of saying sorry?

Keith Williams’ ongoing Rail Review presents a golden opportunity to rebuild the industry’s weakened relationship with its users and ... more >
read more blog posts from 'the sleeper' >

comment

TrackWater: Embracing data in flood prevention

05/02/2019TrackWater: Embracing data in flood prevention

Mike Harding, from Lancaster University’s Data Science Institute, introduces us to TrackWater: an innovative project between Lancaster Univ... more >
High-speed rail cannot stand in isolation

05/02/2019High-speed rail cannot stand in isolation

Last year, the Scottish Government announced two feasibility studies to better understand the economic and environmental implications of options ... more >
Flying Banana reaps the fruit of its labour

05/02/2019Flying Banana reaps the fruit of its labour

Steve Quinby, Network Rail’s head of data collection, gives us the rundown on the state-of-the-art ‘Flying Banana’ train. ... more >
Introducing the new Passenger Assist app

05/02/2019Introducing the new Passenger Assist app

Jacqueline Starr, managing director of customer experience at the Rail Delivery Group, explains how a new app developed for the rail industry wil... more >